

Because sometimes you don’t have a choice, you can only do what you suggest it there’s enough free swap to do so. Otherwise you have to kill processes.


Because sometimes you don’t have a choice, you can only do what you suggest it there’s enough free swap to do so. Otherwise you have to kill processes.
Bruh, I literally said C is faster and that there are different tools for different jobs, I am convinced you’re either trolling or cannot read, either way, you are right, this is pointless
Funny, I thought the same about your comment. Your original complaint was that java lacks unsigned ints, given that’s what you said, that’s what I thought we were talking about
We’re not comparing to C, we’re comparing to a theoretical java that has primitive unsigned ints since that was your original complaint. Ofc C is faster, java is faster to write than C though. I write both, there are different tools for different jobs


It’s been 4 since your welfare check, I’m going with a definitive maybe


Other than size of the keys there’s nothing wrong with it. Still plenty secure (from classical attacks)
Eh, if you use the API, I just go up a size and use bitwise operators, the JIT is fast enough that it’s usually not a problem. Definitely not 100x slower


🤔 I do believe this is backwards, or you’re Japanese
I have written a lot of code that would benefit from primitive unsigned ints…and while it is a little more work to do it java’s way, it’s definitely not a horrid mess
That’s ok, I have enough RAM that I’m not particularly worried about that either. I also don’t leave my computer on all night, I like to be nice to my tech, also locks my drives
Lol, I stopped swapping when I got enough RAM to never need swap


Porting Hurd to RISC-V??? Why? Last I knew they hadn’t added amd64 or UEFI support, adding a whole other ISA seems a little over ambitious for that project if you ask me


I may actually be the other way around. I’m probably better at networking than programming? Not sure, I love them both but do neither professionally.


You can avoid the online account requirement by using pro… although you still need internet without using some form of bypass
I’ve wanted to move elsewhere for a long time, thing is I don’t use nano for programming, I use it for config files. For programming I use an IDE, and every time I’ve tried leaving my IDE for emacs with a language server I find I just can’t be bothered to set it up and learn it and make the move. Maybe because while I have some gripes with my current setup…they’re very minor


I guess it’s good they’re dog fooding it?..I think?


Is this satire or is it from a real project O_O?


As others have said I wouldn’t recommend testing as it doesn’t get security updates, however I personally run sid (unstable) and have for a long time now. At least since 2020 if I recall, it does occasionally break, albeit anecdotally less than my friends arch system, can’t comment on if that’s the distro or just our individual setups. The main reason I run it is because I like debian, I’m very familiar with apt, with its initramfs tools, with all of the debianisms but I wanted something rolling. I tried arch but it just wasn’t as comfy for me personally. That being said it is a bit like hard mode, there is no arch wiki, if you don’t do heavy customization that might be ok, sometimes I’ve wanted to tweak my initramfs and while I know the debian generator better than arch, there’s far less easily accessible documentation on it. In general it’s been such a good experience that I basically stopped distro hopping, it’s been my home now for a long time but I know I’m in the minority with that so take it as you will.


It’s probably in the display name, not the username so that would make sense. Would be interesting to know what happens if display names are on
Don’t need to tell me twice