this si much better articulated than what i said thank you

This is a bit misrepresentative of what he said. He said he believes israel has a right to exist but not as a jewish state which would mean he’s not a zionist because zionism is specifically the bleief that israel should exist as a jewish state. That being said idk why he said it like this seems like a weird thing to say. Idk why he said it like that, israel and a jewish state are partically inseperable.

honestly how being a professor of jewish studies and pro-zionist is crazy work

reminds me of something…

S4A has an audiobook on it. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MVZgtmGmyl4

My friend made this pciture for em

Many have tried and failed.

i mostly use ai for detecting ai generated images, if i’m being honest.

technically they are called chirstian fundementalists. but in america if you say fundemnetalists people will know you are talking about christian fundemnetalists. Maybe in other parts of the world it wouldn’t be as heavily implied when you say fundmentalist, as religious fundementalism is not exclusive to christians. Funnily enough, fundmentalist is often used as a standin for biblicial literalist. That is the techincal term for people who are young earth creationists, atleast generally speaking they are almost always biblical literalists. This could be very dependent on culture though. Biblicial literalism isn’t a very common term among lay people though.

Practically speaking though it’s all semantics.

It’s also just not really true. If you look inot what he actually says it more paints a picture of someone who isn’t very educated on zionism wanting peace in the middle east and equality for all. which isnt’ what zionism is. There seems to be a dedicated effort to try to twist the truth and even outright lie about what martin luther king believed about zionism. But no it was pretty milquetoast centrist take on israel/palestine. Which is definitely still a bad take, especially considering some of his peers like malcom x were very vocally opposed to israel. But it’s not zionism.

i think the word you are looking for is fundementalists.

to be clear as far as i can tell this particular quote isn’t fake though.

malcom x’ szionism quotes kickass ngl.

Assuming there is going to be an ai race which there likely won’t be because the hype bubble is going to burst and peopel are eventually going to realize ai is not what people are making it out to be. China has far more power infrustructure where as the us simply does not have the power infrustructure .

from what i read it’s more like martin luther knig was a centrist on the topic. It’s just there’s a lot of literal fake quotes and out of context snippets that are passed around by pro-zionists. He also seems rather uneducated on the topic of israel. His position seems more like we should have peace an equaul rights and allow jews to be in israel than a zionist persay.

I don’t really get the point of talking aoubt martin luther king’s takes on zionism. This was 80 years ago. He’s an american civil rights leader not a israeli political analyist. Here’s an article about some of the misinformation spread about the topic.

lots of people are like that

You do not have to sex work if you don’t want to. There are people who exist who legitimately enjoy sex work, especially creating pornography though. Factory work historically and even to a lesser extent contemporarily is rather unsafe. I don’t see why sex work has to be unsafe and insecure. Dignified is kind of a vague idea that is very subjective. Yes you do as i genuinely do not udnerstand how sex work is less safe than factory work. If you were talking about something an office job i could maybe get your point but factory work, no. There are considerable dangers with both professions which can be mitigated by taking the right safety measures.

I don’t understand what do you disagree on, The whole point i’m making is that judging sex workers is a form of misogyny and oppression and must be opposed to liberate women from patriarchy. Being pro-sex worker means opposing coercive sex work.

I don’t associate lgbtq with kink, however, there is intersectional alliance between kinksters, sex workers, drag performers and the lgbtq community. It’s an alliance of convience, enemy of my enemy is my friend. They are not nessicarly related althogh kink adn sex work often overlap and so do drag perforemrs and lgbtq.

I can’t work or live in mainstream polite society i have severe autism.

You seem to be confusing the idea of sex work and prositution they are not the same thing. Sex work can be prositituion but it can also be things like only fans or being a pornstar. It could techincally extend to further things but generally it tends to be used for prostitiuion and pornography. I think something you are confusing is this is not about sex work itself, but the misogynistic and exploitative ways sex workers are treated. Shaming sex workers for being sex workers is afurthering of the system of misogyny and patriarchy. Being pro sex worker is not about being pro sex work but about being pro sex worker. About being against discrimination against sex workers and wanting to reduce exploitation of sex workers.

You literally say you aren’t selling your body despite literally selling manual labor direclty using your body. If prostituion is selling your body doing manual labor is selling your body too. Like if you were a programmer or something that is more aobut intellectual labor than physical labor you might be able to make an arguement here but you are very literally selling your physical labor.

Sex work is part of queer history is more similiar to the idea of bdsm bieng queer. It’s not so much that it’s inherently lgbtq, but like drag races, bdsm (and to a lesser extent kink in general) and sex work have goals that often align because the samea puritan reactinoaries who target one group tend to target the others. It’s comparable to saying socialism is part of black history, it is not comparable to say cotton picking is part of black history. Socialists are a gruop who often fight alongside black people and black peopel are a part of, who often share the same goals as black people that being liberation from capitalistic imperialism.

Legaliziation of something definitley doesn’t only benefit capitalists. I’m going to assume you are talking about prostituion cause generally in the west pornography isn’t legal and considering your post history manuerisms and the place on the internet i am on, you probably are from the united states. In terms of prositution, things that are legal are easy to regulate because they aren’t forced to the black market. in the same way that legalizing drugs makes it safer to use drugs legalizing prostitiuion woudl make it safer to engage in it cause it would be subject to regulation. Also, while it can ins ome circumstnaces be better ot be in prison than not be in prison generally speaking people rpefer to stay out of prison, a such umm. not being put in prison for prosittiuion definitley benefits sex workers.

I feel like there also definitely needs to be aline drawn between coercive sex work and willing sex work which you do not seem to be drawing line with. There is a real difference between doing sex work because you find it enjoyable, or doing it because you think it’s a good way to make money, and doing it cause you are being forced to do it via sex trafficking or it being your only way to survive. The concept of sex-worker exclusionary reactionary feminsim is about excluding sex-workers from liberation from misogyny and patriarchal marginalization, by subjecting them to shaming and discrimination they are often faced with.

Adult film stars literally already have a federally recongized union in the us. There are sex worker unions all across the globe. So like your point that it’s deranged to think they should unionize is a bit silly, because they literally already have unions. The Adult Perfomance Artists Guild. There’s also unions for general sex workers including prostitutes. Sex work unions already are a thing and have been a thing for a while.

It’s sex worker exclusionary reactionary feminism not sex-work exclusionary reactionary feminism. It is also oppressive and furthering the system of patriarchal misogyny to deny or ignore the women who enjoy sex work. And shaming the people who think sex work is an easier way to make money than a regular 9-5, is not really addressing the problems that cause them to feel taht way and is only creating an oppressive attitude towards those people.

I’m not sure if this is satire or not

my god international law is a joke. I don’t even understand what the goal of this possibly coudl be other than pandering.