You don’t change the system from within; the system changes you.
Does this apply to Tucker Carlson?
He’s not part of the system, so he can be a voice that’s worth elevating and amplifying so he can bring change? Something along those lines?
If he got into politics, would it be the same “we already know,” would you know how it goes and so on and stop supporting him?
I’ve since learned that this person doesn’t support Bernie Sanders, AOC, or Zoran Mandami (“I agree with some of his views, but I know where this goes, so I won’t hold my breath.”)
Tucker Carlson, though? Iconoclast. He’s breaking down Western narratives. The Fox News system doesn’t change you… you change the system. Apparently.
What’s your feeling on Zoran Mandami? You posted a podcast recently that had some pretty interesting things to say about him.
Vaccines and legal abortions are the status quo, too, but if I was talking with someone who got cagey when asked what they thought about vaccines and legal abortions, and gave generic answers while saying they really wanted to focus on the importance of underrepresented views like (whatever other topic they were talking about), that would pretty much tell me what I needed to know.
Take all your overgrown infants away
Somewhere
There are too many plaques developed in his brain at this point for him to be able to remember the words “flood” or “policy,” is what it sounds like to me.
I want so badly to be able to catch one of these users doing LLM things. I have tried a few different ways, and I’m sad to say that it has worked 0% of the time and so I gave up the effort. My current theory is that they’re all real human people (well, “real” in the sense of actual humans but sometimes being deceptive about what they are posting and why), but it would be fascinating to find out that some of them are not.
I am very curious about it. With this particular user I think it’s pretty obvious that they’re just doing agitprop for Russia. Whether on behalf of Russia or just freelance isn’t really obvious to me, but the key tell that I’ve noticed is that people who sincerely believe it will at least make some effort to engage and respond (or they’ll just be hostile and then flee.)
The fact that this person doesn’t even seem to give a shit and just blandly broadcasts “whatever if you disagree with me you’re obviously just following Western propaganda, I bring a different perspective, that’s all comrade, you should read it” without seeming to care if it is at all convincing or responsive, is usually a tell of someone who’s just trying to spread a narrative and emphasizing volume over believability or effort level.
His wife shot me a dirty look
Lol I knew you couldn’t do it
All of you in this thread are fucking psychopaths
Kalamata olives and similar little food objects are fine, they are often delicious
Eating the rest of these unflavorful little saltpellets on purpose is a ridiculous thing though
People just have no idea what numbers mean. And, look at how education works here, who could blame them?
Q: What about that massive photo of Trump and the backpack checks for DEI literature
A: That’s fine why do you ask
7 always 7
We must always be critical of all governments and politicians.
Completely agreed. That’s why I am generally critical of all governments and politicians, and take particular pains to promote non-Western news sources.
Hey, do you have anything critical to say about Russia and Putin? Not just a broad statement of agreement that, of course, like all other governments we must be vigilant about them too, but a specific crime they’re committing, and why it is bad. As a natural independent who feels so passionately about this issue, you’ll be totally comfortable talking about that, right?
Honestly this is a great and perfectly realistic outcome. Of course, assuming ICE doesn’t just seize all the voting machines for the next election and Trump wins by 104% (which I think is a lot to ask at this point).
If, somehow, we have free and fair elections coming up, then a splintered right from the bullshit Musk and Joe Rogan put together or whatever, and a splintered left because their constituents want them to stop making it legal to hunt Palestinians for sport, makes it perfectly sensible that the dinosaurs who run our government could declare that some form of post-19th-century voting system that would enable a little bit fairer outcome than FPTP is what’s needed. And, when the dinosaurs want something to happen, it usually actually happens, without all this molasses speed when it is merely because of people dying or whatever the problem the regular people are having is.
Him who mountain crush him no
Him who sun him stop him no
Him who hammer him break him no
Him who fire him fear him no
Him who raise him head above him heart
Him diamond
This is so fascinating lol
How would you contrast Carlson’s dissenting views with Mandami’s?
Like what does Carlson think about Gaza, and what does Mandami? How do their views differ in that regard?
Do you know what show Carlson used to host and where, that was his big entrance into mainstream media, and why he got fired from it? There’s a specific reason he got fired that is interesting. Also, there’s another specific reason he just got fired from the mainstream media, but that one’s a broader topic that gets into the difference between “a viewpoint” and the objective provable truth, which is pretty relevant to your whole shtick here. But, I’m asking about the first time he got fired, not the most recent one.
Isn’t the fact that Carlson was extremely acceptable to the mainstream media, and they to him, apparently up until the point when he started costing them historic sums of money recently, relevant to your whole argument here? His whole thing used to be talking on the mainstream media in exchange for the MSM funding him to say a message they found to be acceptable.
Also what did Mandami used to do before he got into politics? Do you think he has sway with the working class?