

You don’t change the system from within; the system changes you.
Does this apply to Tucker Carlson?
He’s not part of the system, so he can be a voice that’s worth elevating and amplifying so he can bring change? Something along those lines?
If he got into politics, would it be the same “we already know,” would you know how it goes and so on and stop supporting him?
This is so fascinating lol
How would you contrast Carlson’s dissenting views with Mandami’s?
Like what does Carlson think about Gaza, and what does Mandami? How do their views differ in that regard?
Do you know what show Carlson used to host and where, that was his big entrance into mainstream media, and why he got fired from it? There’s a specific reason he got fired that is interesting. Also, there’s another specific reason he just got fired from the mainstream media, but that one’s a broader topic that gets into the difference between “a viewpoint” and the objective provable truth, which is pretty relevant to your whole shtick here. But, I’m asking about the first time he got fired, not the most recent one.
Isn’t the fact that Carlson was extremely acceptable to the mainstream media, and they to him, apparently up until the point when he started costing them historic sums of money recently, relevant to your whole argument here? His whole thing used to be talking on the mainstream media in exchange for the MSM funding him to say a message they found to be acceptable.
Also what did Mandami used to do before he got into politics? Do you think he has sway with the working class?