Thanks! This poly count is fairly representative of 90s 3D like Super Mario 64
It’s fun looking back at the optimizations they had to do back then

For legal reasons I won’t confirm nor deny this

No dragons were lift in this image, but if they are yapping too much, you got to hold their snout and give a smooch

This could mean that OP has either +100 usb chargers, or a fraction of a non-USB-C charger

Nah, Grok took 3 minutes and said along the lines “Something went wrong, try again later”
Probably failed at tokenization or hit a fail safe

I substituted every single include into a single 166 000 line file and sent it. Grok froze :(

deleted by creator

deleted by creator

Thank you! After the flag I was thinking I’d leave it at simple shading, but then I decided to do do some muscle anatomy learning. Shading is my fav part of drawing, it adds so much depth

Anon, ☝️Presenting to the Emergency Room

phew, I dodged this one. My logo is just a purple dragon with no suit

It’s condensed content with simpler terms and plain English, which is helpful for those who aren’t native speakers, like Gamba said.
Simple wiki also comes in handy in topics like biology, which can have very specialized vocabulary.

But in this context, the people who unironically believe in things like the moon not being a reflector can’t be reasoned with. They won’t change their mind no matter how simple English you explain the fact.

Finnish bank osuuspankki logo comes close to qp outline, but it has extra shaft at the top

Google search results are often completely unrelated so it’s not any better. If the thing I’m looking for is obscure, AI often finds some thread that I can follow, but I always double check that information.
Know your tool limits, after hundreds of prompts I’ve learned pretty well when the AI is spitting bullshit answers. Real people on the internet can be just as wrong and biased, so it’s best to find multiple independent sources

thankfully modern ones like molten salt reactors have passive safety, where they stop the reaction if overheating occurs.
edit: My mistake, there’s no active commercial molten salt reactors.
But nuclear power is very safe nowadays because of the multiple fail-safes, which some can still be passive like emergency cooling.
I much rather get electricity from magic rocks than destroying rain forest in developing countries drilling oil, gas or mining coal.
The biggest risk in nuclear is environmental disasters like in Fukushima’s case, which is the last significant nuclear incident in past 13 years

I loved every bit of Rain World! But I ended up quitting it mid play through when it became too hard. I found a way to gather stacks of berries to have enough reattempts for the hard parts, but then got lost where I was even supposed to go and gave up after ~25 hours playtime

Whoop, I mixed up dark souls 3 with Elden ring. Though, the same applies. I did like the gritty atmosphere and lore. The main issue I had was the learning curve and when trying to playing co-op there was no way to turn off strangers joining what I recall. But I bet by now there’s mods for all of that like you said.

I once made the mistake googling easy mode for Elden ring that someone gifted to me. Once I saw the gatekeeping on Reddit, I decided it’s not a game for me and uninstalled. I’m sorry that I suck at video games

It appears to always run in ~30 milliseconds regardless of the tested number, so this might be O(1) until some bottleneck kicks in. Though I have yet to verify the complexity as the quality of division rule depends on a,b and c ranges.
Edit: after some testing it’s some logarithmic complexity when P is bigger than 10^2000

P size, time seconds
10^3000, 3.11
10^4000, 6.43
10^5000, 11.27
10^6000, 17.69
10^7000, 26.31
10^8000, 37.09

Plotting these gave about O(log(P)^2.5)
The bRange, math.gcd() and reciprocal scale with P digit count but rest of the calculations are O(1).
I have no idea why you would need 10^8000 divisibility rule designed hand calculations, but you can get one under a minute and this isn’t even multithreaded!

Funnily enough, I just sped up my own solution by 25000% without compromising anything.
https://pastebin.com/Dkbq2chV

I realized that multiplying the divisor P by its non-zero reciprocal digits, gets you near 10^n which are ideal numbers for the divisibility rules. Which should have been obvious since n * (1/n) = 1, and cutting off the reciprocal results in approximation of 1, which can be scaled by 10^b.
e.g. finding divisibility rules for 7

1/7=0.14285...
7*14=98
7*143=1001
7*1429=10003

The first script was very naive brute force approach.
So instead of searching every combination of a, b and c, I can just check the near multiples of P*reciprocal.
The variables can be solved by P*N = a*10^b + c when b is given and a is 1 to 9
7*1429=10003 would expand to P*N=1*10^4+3