• 45 Posts
  • 528 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: December 31st, 2023

help-circle



  • To be clear, the state being the gatekeeper of tv and radio was a thing in France directly after the war, with the French government literally having the monopoly over the airwaves, but in the latter half of the 20th century they opened up the airwaves to private/independent entities. Basically, we also had a pirate radio movement that managed to turn public sentiment towards being in favor of a certain liberalization of tv and radio.

    Nowadays we’ve come full circle; billionaire-owned media dominates tv and radio, with a handful of more independent stations eaking out a living and meagre audience on the periphery. In a very real sense, advertising and chasing views got to us just like it got the USA.

    Re: gatekeepers, I guess I was more thinking about “hard” forms of it (in contrast to “soft”). You’re certainly correct in stating that they’ve always been around in some way. Still, I think there is a meaningful difference in the case of television, as there were no “pirate broadcasters” to my knowledge even when here in France there were only 1, then 2, then 3 public channels (with about 10 year’s wait between each of their creations).

    Maybe a better phrasing for my question would have been, did Hitler’s radio propaganda more closely resemble todays’s facebook and telegram groups in their unfiltered direct access to people’s eyes and ears?





  • Were there already gatekeepers in the 30s? My understanding was that, radio being a new medium at the time, Hitler was able to do an infowars/Breitbart/prageru style of mass propaganda that was impossible in the existing (print) press.

    It’s only after the second world war that radio and then television were strictly controlled by the state (albeit more in an attempt to unify and homogenize the nation here in France than to ensure the populace would be vaccinated of anti-intellectualism).







  • Jayjader@jlai.lutolinuxmemes@lemmy.worldbad news ipv4 fans
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Same, it’s impressive how much it irks people.

    My own hasty judgement is that [those upset] only speak English, have a prescriptivist take on language (albeit unconsciously), and have no idea how damaging hegemony and uniformity for their own sake can be.

    Also they’re lazy and would rather shame someone than take on a little bit of discomfort to adapt to them.

    I guess that makes it “judgements”, plural.



  • For instances that already have a user base, admins should not make any significant decisions without the consent of their users. This goes against our values, and we will not permit an instance to use Bridgy Fed in this manner. We’ve had conversations on how to handle a situation like this, and we would block instances [3] from doing so. We strongly expect admins to be loud about bridging, especially during signup. 3/10

    This is very encouraging to read from a project that initially did not understand why many would be opposed to an opt-out bridge to ATProto.