Love your placing sightings in reverse fertilizer quality order. Clearly a boy from a farming community

Honestly as an older person (I assume ) it surprised me how few folks know it. Untill I considered the diff in our age groups.

As a child in Oxfordshire I saw them a few times when cycling around the villages, But as a child of the 70s. Cycling miles with little or no parental knowledge of my location. Was not only common for me. But for all folks my age,

Younger folks tend not to have that level of freedom now. And as they age. No time to waste.

Wallabies were rare enough to be fascinating when we spotted them. But not unexpected when seen.

I was about 7 the first time I saw them in the Burford area. And only remember a few occasions after that. So far from common. But we knew they were considered a settled UK species. Much like gray squirrels but less successful.

Honestly she was pretty darn careful not to name Corbyn as leading the group. She openly stated that it was a group within his team that was taking over and not him.

As for being her friend. There is no evidence they have ever been anny more then political allies. She has only ever said she respected him. Never claimed some personal relationship.

The whole not using the word friend argument is just a pathetic one. He is 45 years older then her. It is unlikely they have anything in common beyond politics.

Yep that is how democracy works. Backbenchers represent the voters. When voters are clearly pissed off with a govs actions. That gov listens to back benchers. Or is removed by them in a confidence vote.

It takes longer but not by much. It’s the volts times amps that indicates the actual work done.

Having lived in the UK and the US. Kettles only take a min or so longer in the US. They tend to be 1.6kw rather the. 2kw. Your plugs are slightly higher current then ours. Although your plugs always worried me as rather small connection surface wise.

But people in the US just do not consider boiling water as often as we do. Coffee and green tea tend to be ruined with boiled water.

Whereas many Brits very much prefer the taste of black tea when the water is boiled. It has a significant effect of the flavours released.

As such. Even before electricity was common. Most houses had a kettle that could be boiled on gas or the open fireplace. It’s been common in UK houses since the late 1800s.

Coffee machines do not boil water. Just heat it to below boiling.

This has a significant effect on the brewing of tea. And means the flavour will be very unpleasant to many Brits.

It is also the issue Brits find with the vaste majority of tea sold in American restaurants etc.

Yeah it matter way more to folks who like darker tea.

Water that is boiled allows the tanning to release more effectively. Hence tea made without boiling water thens to look whiter and even when colour is forced out with a spoon. Lacks the same flavour.

Tanning is also why tea has a calming effect. Mached with caffeine. It places the mind in a good state for problem solving. Hence the UK reputation of turning to it for all problems.

Well that and both tanning and caffeine are addictive.

True for coffee and green tea.

UK taste insist black tea must be boiled. And that dose not mean 100c but diff temps at different altitude. Hence most of our kettles use the physics of boiling water. Rather then temp to turn off.

The effect of boiled water releases certain flavours in the tea. Those who like darker tea (more tanning released) tend to be the most fussy about this.

Tanning is also the chemical in tea that calms the mind. Hence why Brits have a tradition of turning to tea in stress etc. the tanning and caffeine work well together to clear allow a relaxed but active mind.

More to the point. Most kettles intentionally do not use temperature to do so. But instead use water pressure from the boil to turn it off.

Because water boils at different tempraturs at different altertudes etc. iE at higher altitudes the kettle will turn off at lower temperatures but the water is still boiling,

It’s relevant because in a population of nearly 70 million. 39 thousand people, are in no way shape or form responsible for all the crap these flag waving ultranationalist are claiming.

There is a reason we call them fascists. It is because every argument they make matches the crap spread by every fascist leader in history. Turning to nationalism and groups of other to divide and distract opposition from the real cause of issues. Is exactly what wealth has done to oppress working class votes. Since the forming of democracy.

They are MPs, not YP MPs, all 6 are independents in parliament. As YP has not fully formed, it has never selected MPs. And as yet absolutely no ability or authority to do so exists within the party procedures. They are just active members at best.

A party that appoints MPs without membership approval is a circle jerk with no interest in democracy. That is the whole point of the movement that set up YP.

Setting up a member led party movement, then allowing some nebulous group of self-appointed leaders to appoint MPs before it’s even formed. Would def be those MPs wanking each other as you suggest.

Maybe look at what the actual party movement stands for. Rather then listening to media bollocks.

Hence why the military. That sort of thing is very within the CRE capability set.

The military has 150k full-time personal. But numbers is not the reason to use military. Skills set is. The UK military is built from professionals with skills to help resolve and organise groups exactly in emergencies like this.

As for standing obligations. Most of that is training and preparing for war or emergencies just like this.

Out of site behind closed door. Is most definitely now what any supporters or now members wanted.

Again look at the facts. 800k people supported the idea of a membership run party that dose not do that shit behind closed doors. Where leadership lack the authority to make policy choices without membership approval.

members and actual party supporters may question some of ZS actions. But their editing of the founding documents since her actions. Make it very clear behind closed door is not acceptable at all.

Most support her ideals of a truly open party. They just think she herself allowed it to go on behind closed doors to long and should have told supporters before asking them to join.

Behind closed doors is the very opposite of what 800k supporters were offered when the party set up.

Wrong. Paying debts allows banks to lend money to companies they would never consider worth the risk. If they did not think the gov was to scared to help.

No truly private company making the choices Thames Water etc al have done. Would have been lent the money they were.

Debt was given by private banks where other companies artificially upping share price while failing to maintain assets. Would be told to fuck off. The banks depended on gov refusing to let the shareholders suffer. And profited from it.

As such those debts value should be the same as any other bankrupt corperation. The assets were never theirs but placed in trust with them as management contractors. That did not manage. And turned to the gov for funding for any expansion. So they had no assets to secure the debt. We should not be supporting stupid banks again.

Fair outcome.

Allow them to go bankrupt with absolutely no help from gov.

Use Millarory stand pipes like in 76 to distribute water to everyone while they vanish as a company.

Then build a new nationalised water system rapidly repairing all assets. Using military to manage and offering well paid work to any unemployed (many of who will be ex water employees) willing and able to take on the job.

Then have government site and stare manically at electrical and gas companies. Asking. " So how do you guys plan to get prices below the world average?"

Despite those arguments being very much open and a part of national news from day one. His view that it lacks openness seems based on some new fangled view of open no one else follows.

And your only evidence being one independent MP who is no more than an active member of the party. That clearly disagreed with the remaining sources standing with the party. And decided leaving was his only way to effect a losing argument.

The more logical conclusion is Adnan Hussain was unwilling to work with the rest of the party.

Yes, it’s one argument the leaders of both sides of the debate worked together. And one member that happened to be an MP and have no leadership role in the party ( as no one currently does. Even Corbyn is no more than an acting figurehead for the electoral commission rules until after conference). Left after the debate was settled by other active members.

As I keep saying. The media view of YP is totally false and ignores every other party, having much worse arguments all the time. Anyone who wants to can look into the causes and arguments of the debate. It really takes no effort to see it is to be expected given the current stage and risk involved in setting up any party from an idealistic movement. And no different to the history of every other party in the UK.

Dose the party have a few issues. Of course, it’s 2 Months old and attempting a first time set up of a very complex structure. But to claim it is failing is totally failinbg to look at any of the internals or plans of the party. Because even with such debates. Everything promissed is happening on schedule. And the actors involved are in no way managing or in most cases even trying to take control while the membership is built.

And in exchange for well below NMW benifit costs by the government.

Comapanies get free labour and fire jobs they paid for. Both evidenced multiple times.

So yes, it is free welfare for the corporations. Not individuals that need it. And as it clearly leads to unemployment for employees of those industries. ~It is clearly a move from vol;entry employment to outright slave labour.

Except it is not NMW never has been when gov order work for benifits. And here it is for free.

So your comment has no real points at all.

Hell if any gov pushed local authorities to pay NMW to benefit claiments in exchange for work for the community/infastructure. No one would complain. Except maybe the companies currently charging way more. And I’m pretty sure they would have media objecting all over the place.

But at every point it has been a way for companies to gain free labour from well below NMW gov paid benefits.

Sorry but rubbish.

Civil service cuts had nothing to do with paying doctors. The 2 events were years apart in announment.

And austerity was very much a government choice. One you are welcome to agree with. But it being the only option was an out right lie. And it funded huge cuts in corperation taxes etc. Not the NHS.

As for above inflation. Only if you totally ignore 14 years of no or below inflation pay rises. Is it in anyway possible to say the last one was above the recent yearly inflation.

Cheers my spelling is crap