• 0 Posts
  • 478 Comments
Joined 2 年前
cake
Cake day: 2024年6月24日

help-circle



  • The landlord has valid rights too, fighting policeman is definitively the wrong solution to this problem. The proper way would be in implementing a wellfare system that helps this (mostly old/sick) people when they can’t pay their bills. Fighting policemen for evicted people would be like only putting a bandaid over a punctured arthery. It may help for a, very short, time but in the end leads to nowhere.

    But this is a tangent and topic that is very interessting to discuss but i fear is way to offtopic for this place










  • as far as I read the law, but i am neither a lawyer or even american, are those Option only needed for Systems with users and a user, as defined by the same law, is

    (i) “User” means a child that is the primary user of the device.

    The law says nothing about Systems that don’t have such a “user”, or at least i could not find anything.

    So, there could be a valid argument that the law does differentiate.








  • Germany has a similar law already active

    §12 Jugendmedienschutzstaatsvertrag

    (1) Anbieter von Betriebssystemen, die von Kindern und Jugendlichen üblicherweise genutzt werden im Sinne des § 16 Abs. 1 Satz 3 Nr. 6, stellen sicher, dass ihre Betriebssysteme über eine den nachfolgenden Absätzen entsprechende Jugendschutzvorrichtung verfügen. Passt ein Dritter die vom Anbieter des Betriebssystems bereitgestellte Jugendschutzvorrichtung an, besteht die Pflicht aus Satz 1 insoweit bei diesem Dritten.

    (3) In der Jugendschutzvorrichtung muss eine Altersangabe eingestellt werden können

    But yes, neither such laws nor the implementation into systemd is in any way positive and should be fought