• 0 Posts
  • 23 Comments
Joined 3 months ago
cake
Cake day: September 12th, 2025

help-circle

  • Jesus, I mean to be honest I live in the south east (aka the part of the UK that effectively leeched of the rest of britbong land when we began to enter the end stage of capitalism) and even down here I wouldn’t exactly describe the situation as great, sure you do get actual protein in your food parcels here but it’s only slightly better to be honest, and your certainly not getting enough food to meet your required caloric intake per month that’s for sure.

    To be honest I think the government is doing it on purpose, in the place I work at we have more than enough food (for fuck shake I was literally having to squeeze in what I could.) probably so that the proles will be too starved to riot (probably won’t work mind you, believe me the Tsarists tried this in Russia and all it led to was for the peasants and proles to Join the Bolsheviks.) but yeah, in my opinion most foodbanks absolutely have enough food to go around it’s just that the government wants to starve the proles so they don’t have the energy to revolt.


  • I actually work at a Foodbank and I can tell you if people are having issues getting stuff from a Foodbank it ain’t because there low on stock, that’s for sure.

    Like seriously last Tuesday we had issues simply putting away all of the “donations” (in air quotes because most of our supply comes from Tesco’s and friends, not from like dudues leaving donations or anything.) so if foodbanks are utterly incapable of doing much it ain’t because we got a lack of supply.

    Actually thinking about this we usually don’t give out much food per donation, like, for a family of four for instance we probably make up like 4 boxes or something like that, which is basically fuck all to be honest especially for a family that size, like I guess if you wanted to be generous it would be enough for 1000 calories per day per person, which again is on the generous side of things, certainly nowhere near the recommended caloric intake for men and women.

    TL:Dr, foodbanks are probably holding back on the donations they give out even when you do get vouchers, so yeah, fuuunnnnn.




  • Yeah, this is like utterly bullshit.

    Housing prices in china have generally been on the decline since 2021. Really there hyper focusing on like down town motherfucking tier one city apartments despite the fact that chinas infrastructure is so advanced that is is more than possible for someone to live in the cheaper outskirts of town and simply commute by train or bus into the city (this is fairly common in like Hong Kong, onto where living in the city is fucking awful but the wages there aren’t that bad, hence most people simply live in nearby Shenzhen and NOT bamboo scaffolding city )





    1. Oh yeah it’s going to pop at some point and, for the west, and well pretty much every other capitalist country, it’s going to be devastating, most people are already on the brink, another crisis on the scale of, or even exceeding, that of 2008 is likely to cause a lot of turmoil (e.g., it will either kill the US outright, or at the very least rapidly speed up it’s dissolution.)

    Now for other countries I think the effects are going to vary alot, china probably won’t be effected to much as the only reason why it was effected by 2008 was due to the decline in consumption in the west, which obviously isn’t as big as an issue as it was before as china pretty heavily diversified it’s export destinations as well as increased consumption internally via increasing their citizens wealth.

    For Russia I would say it probably won’t be as bad as the west but will absolutely effect them, which will likely make Putin’s life a living hell at literally the worst time possible for the Russian Bourgeoise class (currently Russia is experiencing a large scale resurgence in socialism thanks to the SMO as well as increases ties to china making surpressing campaigns, complicated.) which could potentially be a catalyst for a socialist restoration.

    Burggerreich and pals, honestly it depends on how bad it is and how your average westoid is, American is probably the worst in this regard, most of its citizens are already on the brink (something which is pretty notable as most Americans before the great depression and 2008 where relatively well of.) which means that the actual crash itself doesn’t nessercery need to be as bad as the great depression or 2008 to well, utterly implode the United states. Europe is well, it’s varied. Germany and France ain’t in the best positions economically but I think they are far enough away from the blast zone as well as sufficiently insulated to well, not die, TERF island, no, no, it’s fucked.

    Other third world nations would probably vary alot, India relies a lot on foreign investment so will probably be hit hard, same thing with other third world nations which rely a lot on foreign investment for eco omic growth (well, western economic “investment”)

    1. “Dying in the jungle, harvesting up the black gold, dying for profits…” - song by AWOL (as in defected) amerikkkan draftee Samuel Coke, US invasion of Venezuela, 2027.

    Yeah, I don’t really need to tell you how badly this will end for America if they actually do this. basicslly the war is either going to be Vietnam or Another Ukraine, either way both are incredibly shit for the United States.

    1. Eh, to be honest nothings going to happen with this one, again, china and the CPC are more than aware that the buggerreich is currently devouring itself wholesale, so why should the CPC like invade Taiwan now when they can just wait five, ten, maybe even less years till America is either dead or at the very least embroiled in a civil war, don’t make much sense to do it now.

    2. Similar thing here, the SMO is slowly, but inevitably, being won by Russia, and really Europe wont directly intervene less it has to.

    To be honest I think what’s more interesting is what’s going to follow, assuming that Russia only takes the five oblasts they currently control outright (and don’t like, try to push the Ukrainians west of the Dnieper or something) then it’s going to leave the Russians in a interesting geo-political position.

    Basically ever since the Russo-Ukraine war began Russia has seen it’s economic ties shift considerably, with it’s once strong trade ties with the west being effectively obliterated, Russia is forced to rely on exporting it’s goods to eastern markets (more particularly China, Vietnam, and India.) to support it’s heavily export focused economy.

    This in turn has notable political consequences, for one it means that Russia’s main trade partners (excluding India obviously) are socialist, which does have notable implications for Russia domestic political situation.

    Even after three decades since the collapse of the Soviet Union, socialist thought and support has maintained a strong presence within Russia despite government crackdowns. This “Socialist Nostalgia” has only continued to persist and grow within Russia as internal material contradictions, in a similar manner to how they spurred dessent against Capitalist thoughts in the west and pretty much everywhere else, continues to empower socialist political movements such as the KPRF.

    While in the 2010s the russian government was able to fairly effectively surpress revanchist socialist thought, the increasing ties of Russia to Socialists states, and more particularly the reliance of Russian Exports on Chinese buyers, has places the Russian Capitalist class in a rather, unfortunate for them, predicament, where there options for surpressing growing socialist appeal becomes rather limited, less they face a soft scale retaliation by their new partners (e.g., China potentially tariffing russian exports, for one.)





  • Oh yeah absolutely. Capitalism in an inherently exploitative system and capitalists often view their children as their property and “investment.”, so obviously enough a lot of porkies (national and petite) tend to well be disperporitonately more abusive and controlling in comparison to those of the working class, largely because of the fact that they view their children and property and invests far more than the working class.

    Now obviously this does vary from country to country, for an example, china is much less likely to have abusive porkies largely because if and or when they are found out the CPC WILL strike like a hammer, while in comparison to the west, this behaviour among the Capitalist class is likely to become much more prominent as the state is much less likely to Intervene in comparison to a Proletarian state like china.

    This also does tie into things such as sexual abuse and exploitation, porkies are much more likely to be pedos, or view sex as a transaction (which is exploitative, and why every single ML worth their salt should be completely and utterly opposed to prostitution, and pornography.) which again can vary from well, Jeffery Epstein fans, to russian oligarchs that purely marry girls for the looks and not because they actually love them or something.


  • Eh, it sorta does but it’s a bit confusing to an outside observer because obviously enough Iraqi ba’athism is probably more closely related to fascism of National socialism then it is actual socialism, while typically the Ba’athism practiced in Syria was more closely aligned to actual socialism, well for a time at least (Bashar Al Assad eventually decided to drink the lib juice and effectively torpedoed the Syrian economy with liberal economic reforms, and hence kicked off the Syrian civil war so, fun.)

    Either way the more accurate statement would be to say is that ba’athism is ultimately a Arab nationalist ideology that has two, almost entirely distinct branches.

    Right-wing Ba’athism, the sort of Ba’athism practiced in Iraq before the Americans decided to invade and then effectively turn the country into an Iranian puppet state.

    Left-wing Ba’athism, practiced in Syria which then eventually got dumptered by liberal infiltration (Bashar Al Assad) and then hit the shits at mark 8 velocity.

    Either way Ba’athism is for all intense and purposes a dead ideology, that failed due to the inherent contradictions of all regimes (even socialist ones) built without a class base, this is the same reason why Nassarism failed as well, btw, so yeah, tl’dr, even your trying to make a socialist state then your first priority should be to root your politics on that of a class line, something that Nassarism, Left wing Ba’athism, and quite a few others failed to do (though Nassarism could in my opinion but still, and maybe left wing Ba’athism, maybe.)


  • I mean yeah, though to be honest I think after WW2 Stalin was dealing with a shit load of stress (well, even before then, during the begining of operation Barbarossa the guy has a massive mental breakdown for like more than a week, probably due to the sheer speed of the German advance and how it looked to be almost unstoppable at the time.) so I think Stalin trying to resign in 1952 was likely due to stress related reasons, not to mention if Stalin simply resigned and well, didn’t die of either stress or poisoning (not that it really matters since the guy who may have did the poisoning was killed like 5 nanoseconds after Stalins death.) then it’s likely that a seemly succession process could of been held which would keep out cringelords like Kruschev or Beria.

    Basically the moral of the story for future or current AES states, if your amazing leader wants to retire, then let him/her, sure you’ll lose their guidance but there’s probably a reason why they want to retire yknow?


  • Pretty much this, after the whole (industrialising the entire country to the point that we can outproduce most of the Axis combined, even after loosing a shit load of territory during WW2) Stalin was effectively trapped in his position for his remaining days, plus I think it should be noted Stalin died really young (like 53) so most members of the Politburo and Supreme soviet didn’t really think Stalin had any real reason to resign, if Stalin didn’t die from his heart (or more likely , poisoning from Beria.) then it’s likely Stalin would of been leading the USSR well into the 1970s considering the average life expectancy of the USSR at the time.