Yes their airspace and US military bases are used for offensive attacks on Iran.

Source?

That is absolutely a legal target for Russia too. I

Not according to international law, as I understand it.

That stance makes absolutely no sense. If a nation is invading you the military bases belonging to that nation are valid legal targets.

Well yes and not - but that is how international law works. As an analogy, Russia is not attacking tanks heading through the EU to Ukraine, before they pass the border into Ukraine.

There has to be a consensus of what constitutes a legal target. Or the whole world would be anarchy.

But at the same time those same people are in panic about stuff like trans people and public bathrooms. Which has never and will never affect them personally.

radar and electronic warfare and refueling and on and on

NATO is sending radar intel to Ukraine too - is NATO waging war on Russia? By international law, I would say not.

Russia is also sending satellite into to Iran. Also not an act of war.

It seems quite important to me that there is a consensus on what constitutes an act of war. Otherwise everything becomes a potential act of war, no meaningful limits or red lines people know not to cross, with corresponding escalation risks.

Wikipedia says:

Vibe coding involves accepting AI-generated code without reviewing it,

If you are using LLMs to write e.g. small components, then you are typically understanding the structure of the program, and reviewing it.

Which would be justifiable in print. But this is not print, using it here is suboptimal and silly.

Oh, I don’t dispute that it is a horrible law! It just doesn’t justify the title lying about it.

The title is a lie. They are still allowed to use the bathroom corresponding to their gender assigned at birth. From the article:

The Idaho House passed legislation that could make it a felony for transgender people to step foot in a bathroom matching their gender identity.

Is Saudi Arabia allowing strikes from bases on their soil into Iran? If not, then from a legal/moral point of view Saudi Arabia is completely in the right, since Iran has attacked Saudi Arabia first.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Headline#Headlinese

Have to make sure the Internet doesn’t run out of bit, by using mangled English!

Just yesterday, Danish media posted a description of how they planned to blow up airport runways to slow down an American invasion of Greenland. And how other European countries sent soldiers to help defend.

Trump complaining about Europe now not helping in Iran is some major chutzpah…

Hvordan fandt du frem til Feddit.dk?

Jeg spurgte ChatGPT om reddit-alternativer.

Det er åbenlyst udbud-efterspørgsel. Så giv mulighed for at bygge flere boliger.

Jeg antager at problemet er mangel på byggetilladelser til at bygge i højden. Der er masser af s-togsstationer i villakvarterer - jeg ville starte med at give tilladelser til at bygge i 5 etager omkring disse.

Du kan se det samme i USA - Texas giver mulighed for at bygge hvadsomhelst, hvorsomhelst, mens Californien har meget stramme regulativer. Californien har en boligkrise, Texas har ikke. Ikke at jeg siger at vi skal droppe al regulation, men jeg tror ikke den nyværende model i København er korrekt.

Desuden er der tilsyneladende lovkrav om 95m^2 størrelse i halvdelen af nybyggeri. Hvilket virker meget dumt, da der mangler små lejligheder.