• Tar_Alcaran
    link
    fedilink
    English
    547 months ago

    They do, but the scientific phrasing is “ritual purposes”.

    • @Strayce
      link
      English
      547 months ago

      That’s academic for “we have no idea what this was for”. Except in the case of “fertility ritual” – that means it’s a sex toy.

    • TheEntity
      link
      fedilink
      127 months ago

      Now that you mention it, it’s commonly used for the contemporary idiocy too.

    • @Strayce
      link
      English
      67 months ago

      deleted by creator

  • El Barto
    link
    fedilink
    English
    6
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    I don’t get it. How are the archeology articles written, then?

    Edit: I get it now.

    • @Knusper@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      187 months ago

      Humans have this tendency of assuming everyone else is dumb. Whether that’s their neighbor, a different generation, a foreign nation, different skin colors, different religions, different species or indeed extinct civilizations, pretty much everyone is assumed to be barbaric, until proven otherwise.

      And so, yeah, it’s usually a revelation like wow, they had calendars, they must have actually been smarter than we thought.

      • El Barto
        link
        fedilink
        English
        117 months ago

        Got it. Thanks. And yup, I agree. I’ve always found silly that people are stunned that others in the past had complex knowledge. Like, bitch, the way you live now is thanks to the efforts of those in the past.

        Imagine people 2000 years from today, using quantum tech for a lot of things, AI, transportation, etc, saying “whoa, can you believe it?! They already had hadron colliders in the 2000s! WHOA!” Then we’d be like, “bitch, all those things you’re enjoying in your time is thanks to us. We are the ones who should be impressed, not the other way around. Like, you’re still using microwaves to cook stuff?!?!?! Whoa!”