Edit: I’ve been schooled in the comments, this is no longer a thing, they’ve relented and allowed more control over the censor list. But hey, it’s kinda funny still, so, feel free to keep reading if you like…

Original post follows.

Coming here from the Great #RedditMigration. When all of the alternatives were being discussed, one thing I noticed was that Lemmy seems to have one single global slur list that’s literally hard-coded into the software. Your only option (as a server admin) is to either enable or disable it, but the words it’s going to block are permanent and unchangeable unless you can talk the devs into updating the regex for the next release.

And I checked out some of their GitHub issues, and the devs seem almost militantly defensive of this. Like, they are not entertaining any suggestions at all to make it editable. Their actual solution is, if you don’t like it, fork the repo and change it your own damn self, but we’re not touching it, go piss up a rope. Don’t mind one of the words they don’t like? Too bad. English word is perfectly innocuous in your language? Piss off. Want to block the equivalent Djiboutian words? Believe it or not, go to hell.

Seems like such a weird hill to die on. And this is concerning as the lemmyverse is just taking off. This just seems like such an easy and obvious thing to make configurable for all kinds of reasons, and they’re just closing down tickets. Not even a “don’t have time right now but we’ll put it in the backlog and get there soon”. Just, nope.

So anyways. I dunno where I’m going with this really. I’m not in a position to really do anything about it. So this is just a rant I guess. But if the main devs of this thing we’re all migrating to are this… I dunno, arrogant? Opinionated?.. already, then what’s gonna happen later when there are actual real issues that need addressed? We’re leaving one spezhole and going straight to another?

    • @ilovededyoupiggy@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      251 year ago

      I’m glad they’ve relented and made it editable now! The threads I’d seen mastodon about it, and the links to their GitHub tickets, were pretty disappointing to me. Glad it’s not the case anymore.

      • @nivenkos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        171 year ago

        FWIW it’s been this way for well over a year IIRC.

        But the instance you post on needs to have it configured reasonably too.

  • @CookieJarObserver@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    171 year ago

    This was actually removed from the code (or opt in) so its a stupid argument, the handling on github wasn’t cool but the code is actually 100% open source and everyone can edit it easily/fork it.

    There are lot of such arguments but they are all invalidated by the fact that lemmygrad and exploding heads both exist on this code and are available. (super commies and Nazis) the og code makers are moderation lemmygrad, they could probably defederate exploding heads from everywhere by default hard coded, but it’s not.

    Basically All arguments against lemmy regarding the politics or most against the code are invalid.

    • @ilovededyoupiggy@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      41 year ago

      I’m glad they’ve relented and made it editable. But, imo, “fork it yourself” does not invalidate any argument. Thats just going to result in Lemmy, and Lenny, and Lambchop, and Lemmiwinks, and lord knows what else… Or, worse, people are gonna fork whatever the current version is and then have to constantly merge upstream changes into their fork. Or not. So now you’ve got Lemmy 0.17.4 and Larry 0.16.5 and Loser 2.5 (because that dude changed the version number for shits and grins) and Microsoft Lemmy 2000 Me XP Pro Student & Teacher Edition. Because someone was capable of getting his server up and running but doesn’t have the time or inclination or experience to keep it properly up to date, because keeping it properly up to date is now much more difficult than it needs to be, because he had the audacity to disagree with one guy about what words he does and doesn’t want to see.

      It may be an argument in and of itself against making a given change, but it certainly doesn’t invalidate any other arguments. And I don’t think it’s a very compelling argument anyway.

      The whole idea of this federation business seems to be about freedom of choice and getting away from “them” telling “us” what we can and can’t do with our time, our content, our data. And basically my first experience with this platform was seeing the primary dev shutting down multiple issue tickets full of perfectly reasonable arguments because… I dunno, “Nazis are bad and I’m smarter than you, mmmkay”, I guess?

      Just not a good look I don’t think. It definitely turned me off. I’m still here giving it a shot, but that kind of attitude doesn’t make me overly confident in the future of the platform.

      Like I said, I’m glad they’ve relented, and I really hope this all works out.

      • @CookieJarObserver@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        51 year ago

        But, imo, “fork it yourself” does not invalidate any argument. Thats just going to result in Lemmy, and Lenny, and Lambchop, and Lemmiwinks, and lord knows what else…

        as long as you don’t change the principal of the federation system it will remain the same, even kbin and mastodon are reachable from here and can put content here, you can change some things like link a own CSS to have a different GUI or make some other things with it.

        They would only need to update the code if its a change regarding the federation (votes, posts etc)

        The whole idea of this federation business seems to be about freedom of choice and getting away from “them” telling “us” what we can and can’t do with our time, our content, our data. And basically my first experience with this platform was seeing the primary dev shutting down multiple issue tickets full of perfectly reasonable arguments because… I dunno, “Nazis are bad and I’m smarter than you, mmmkay”, I guess?

        As said the handling was bad, but since then it seems to have changed and since the code is open source its 100% possible to fork it and work on it with a new dev team, if its better than the current one its gonna be used by more instances as well.

        The altitude seems to have changed a lot since then as well.

        • @ilovededyoupiggy@sh.itjust.worksOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          01 year ago

          The attitude I guess is what bugged me the most, so I’m really glad that’s changed. I do understand that forking is a valid option for those with the wherewithal to do it, just seemed pretty arrogant of them to force that decision on everyone and not even entertain anything else. Thanks for setting me straight there!

          • @Difficult_Bit_1339@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 year ago

            That’s always been the nature of open source software. Any large instances will have people who can handle forking code and applying patches to fix any issues that they have locally.

            As the software environment matures there will likely be many many different flavors of Lemmy, hopefully this is something that can be kept from being too fragmented by the developer making the code modular and supporting plugins or similar but if they don’t and there is a strong need then someone else will.

            As long as interoperability is maintained (and it will be since everything is built on ActivityPub) it doesn’t matter what flavor of web interface you’re using.

    • 50gp
      link
      fedilink
      -11 year ago

      those kinds of people will just keep doing dumb stunts in the future and everyone should use alternatives/forks asap

  • @nivenkos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    141 year ago

    It has been configurable already, for at least a year if not more.

    I wish it weren’t enabled by default too though.

  • @thirdorbital@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    111 year ago

    I naively want to believe that this won’t be an issue for most users having most conversations. But out of curiosity can you link what the ban list actually contains?

    • @wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      91 year ago

      I ran into this earlier today, I couldn’t even figure out what the word was. Rewrote my message three times, and then gave up.

      • @New_account@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Gotta love when classic cl***ic profanity filters are implemented without learning the mistakes that have been made again and again over the last 30 years.

        • TheTedJamesExperiment
          link
          fedilink
          7
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          From Software games have filters for player names and it often leads to stuff like this. Thus if you put “knight” in your character’s name, a common thing that people do given that they’re medieval fantasy games, it appears as “k***ht.” Likewise “dead” becomes “d***” and “Thomas” becomes “T**mas.” Even more embarrassingly, the filter is case sensitive and all the filtered words are lowercase, so you could name your character a slur and it would be fine as long as you capitalize the first letter.

        • @taladar@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 year ago

          It is known as the Scunthorpe problem after a town in, I think England and a certain word it contains that is often blocked.

      • MeowdyPardner
        link
        fedilink
        71 year ago

        I think you have to ask the admin of sh.itjust.works what they set the filer to because it seems customizable now.

  • @PriorProject@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    101 year ago

    Have you confirmed that the word list is still in play? I thought after much debate they killed it a decent while ago.

  • AnonymousLlama
    link
    fedilink
    61 year ago

    I think from memory that the kbin dev was talking about getting “AutoMod” enabled on the site to help future moderation so having something like that would give you more options over how content is held in moderation.

    I assume once AutoMod gets integrated there won’t be a need for a global ban list anymore.

  • Protahgonist
    link
    fedilink
    51 year ago

    Reduced because this is already no longer an issue, making this an amusing rant but also disinformation. In any case, come to kbin! It’s very nice.

  • @Googleproof@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    41 year ago

    Spez is a symptom of reddit’s problem, not the problem itself. Put someone in who wants to help the users more than the investors, and the investors will just kick them out. Which is why I’m more sympathetic to the Marxists around here.

    So far as a ban list goes, it’s better to be hard-coded than a database call for performance reasons, and if it stops 95% of bad actors, that’d be a good thing. Problem is that it won’t, they’ll find a way around the regex. So yeah, this is something that should be handled by mods or communities.

    It provides a minor inconvenience to people wanting to set up alt-right instances, and makes them feel unwelcome, so maybe that’s enough to justify it’s existence.

  • lohrun
    link
    fedilink
    21 year ago

    You could always join us in kbin land ;) @ernest has been a really supportive dev and there seems to be more devs over here willing to help him work on it

    • naunan
      link
      fedilink
      01 year ago

      But man, I think we need to clone him or something. That’s hell of a job right now.

      • lohrun
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        We’re trying to spin up more instances and hopefully get some devs spun up on the code base. There are A LOT of bug and feature requests coming in right now

  • BuddhaBeettle
    link
    fedilink
    11 year ago

    Since that issue seems to be resolved, just came here to say, I did experiment this issue on a smaller scale on reddit.
    Lets just say a very common color and sometimes even word of endearment for your loved ones in my native language is a common english slur (and a very bad one at that). I would be telling my friends of the x colored dress I bought via chat and the message would be flagged down and would not send.
    I had to be very careful cause I was afraid my account would get banned one day.

      • BuddhaBeettle
        link
        fedilink
        31 year ago

        Yep, that would be exactly the case.
        If someone from the US heard us talking to our friends and family in our native tounge, I think a few would have a meltdown.
        “Little black crayola pencil” is a common nickname for friends and family (regardless of skin tone).
        My grandma, bless her soul, socially changed her name when she was in her 20s from “Mary” to “female black crayola pencil”, its the only name she’s answered to from that day till the day she died, no one batted an eye.

  • Reaeal
    link
    fedilink
    English
    11 year ago

    Romanian speakers: Is that a beech tree?

    Lemmy:

  • 🐱TheCat
    link
    fedilink
    English
    11 year ago

    ‘believe it or not, go to hell’ is my new catchphrase and you can’t stop me

    but also maybe throw an edit at the top of your post to say this is a solved issue if you want to prevent spreading disinformation.