anarchost@lemm.ee to BreadTube@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-24 months agoDeletedgoogle.comexternal-linkmessage-square5fedilinkarrow-up19arrow-down13cross-posted to: sino@hexbear.netbreadtube@lemmy.worldbreadtube@lemmy.world4chan@lemmy.worldbreadtube@lemmy.worldbreadtube@lemmy.world30rock@dubvee.organticonsumption@slrpnk.netanticonsumption@slrpnk.net
arrow-up16arrow-down1external-linkDeletedgoogle.comanarchost@lemm.ee to BreadTube@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-24 months agomessage-square5fedilinkcross-posted to: sino@hexbear.netbreadtube@lemmy.worldbreadtube@lemmy.world4chan@lemmy.worldbreadtube@lemmy.worldbreadtube@lemmy.world30rock@dubvee.organticonsumption@slrpnk.netanticonsumption@slrpnk.net
minus-squareanarchost@lemm.eeOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down1·1 year agoHmm… Should I make it clearer that this is an LGBT person’s response to Matt Walsh, and not the Matt Walsh video itself
minus-squareunfreeradical@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·edit-21 year agoNot allowing his face to be prominently exposed would be the purest ideal. Otherwise, perhaps mark a post as NSFW, so the image would be displayed as blurred.
Let me ask my dog.
Hmm… Should I make it clearer that this is an LGBT person’s response to Matt Walsh, and not the Matt Walsh video itself
No, I got it. Thanks.
Not allowing his face to be prominently exposed would be the purest ideal.
Otherwise, perhaps mark a post as NSFW, so the image would be displayed as blurred.