• qrstuvM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 day ago

    The needs of the many pandas outweigh the needs of the few pandas! Thank you for creating content!

  • Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 day ago

    You guys are just now catching on to this? I’ve been killing pandas for so long, I’m proud to say that there isn’t a single one within 50 miles of me.

    • pmjv
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      23 hours ago

      You have to cook it for very very long and then bathe in bleach. My girlfriend did this with sheep heads.

      • jdr@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Easy to boil heads when you’re a pile of Nvidia’s finest

        • pmjv
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          20 hours ago

          Nah, this was before AI actually! Her family had a sheep farm, and when they would slaughter the sheep, she’d keep the heads, clean them into skulls, and use them for art sculptures and shit.

  • Postmortal_Pop@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    Panda’s are such a useless thing. Like, I genuinely hate them as a species. Out there like Nature’s fucking Incel, can only eat four fucking things and none of them have any nutritional content. Can’t fucking breed to save their own species and need a whole different species to create porn just for them to maybe keep them around. Can’t be bothered to finish evolving from carnivore to herbivore so they can actually eat the fucking wood they decided was food.

    We kill so many fucking awesome species by accident but we’d better keep this literal icon of self sabotage alive because it looks like it’s dressed like a mime and it’s ok to laugh at them when they look like a fat kid falling down a hill. Literally only capable of being a marketable mascot.

    Fucking pandas…

    • ‮zcm🍰@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      Sorry to destroy your bubble but that’s bullshit propagated by anti pandarists. Nature’s fucking incel? You’re a fucking incel.

      1. “can only eat one thing” - ultimate evolutionary pro gamer move. Evolved to eat the super invasive grass that grows with the speed of like 1 Japanese Jesus’ height per day. And what’s the competition? A rabbit? Come on, pandas win here by securing a constant supply of food
      2. “can’t fucking breed” - myth. The fact that pandas still exist is a proof that they can breed. They only have problems with breeding in captivity, which is a case for most animals. Besides, have you ever seen a panda on tinder? Only as a wingman.
      3. “can’t be bothered to finish evolving” bad news 4u dude, nothing ever finishes evolving. This is not how it works. Carnivores and herbivores are labels invented by humans because we humans like to label things.
      4. “we kill so many fucking awesome species” is probably the only truth
      5. “but we better kill this literal icon of self sabotage alive” - we wouldn’t have to keep this animal alive if we stayed in our fucking lane and didn’t destroy ecosystems. And it’s not a choice between keeping pandas alive and keeping other animals alive, we can do both by not being assholes. And I nominate humans as icons of self sabotage
      6. “because it looks like it’s dressed like a mime and it’s ok to laugh at them while they look like a fat kid rolling down the hill” - yeah so what I’m not allowed to look at my cat acting funny? Or idk literally every other animal being funny or stupid? Cats do funny jumps when surprised, dogs eat shit sometimes and jellyfishes just float in the water and you’re judging pandas for their pattern and rolling down the hill. But it’s not a measure of animal’s worth if you think it’s funny or not. So fuck you.
      • pmjv
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        23 hours ago

        Thank you. I am surprised. You impressed me here. Perhaps you are on pandas’ side.

        I am now internally conflicted. Perhaps your company does have a point…

    • ‮zcm🍰@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      Dollars for my panda killing business? Of course not. Why would even suggest something like that.

      A million of pandas.

      Are you anti panda?

  • pmjv
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    also is it a coincidence that the thumbnail looks like a neverslop kitto?

      • pmjv
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        your claim that it’s necessary

        • mcz@horp.sciops.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 day ago

          Oh, it’s my panda killing business, but just think about it. There are infinite possible futures so there has to be one with infinite pandas. Infinite pandas can only fit in outer space. If we like pandas we need to go to outer space ASAP, otherwise we’re killing millions of potential future pandas. You can’t go to space without killing at least one panda. Therefore we have to start killing pandas to save future pandas. I call this effective pandaism.

          • pmjv
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 day ago

            Because I am stupid I don’t understand any of this.

            What I do understand though: Dead panda = bad.