BL4CKP1XX13 [they/it]@lemmy.dbzer0.com to linuxmemes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 days agoWe all have goals.lemmy.dbzer0.comimagemessage-square59linkfedilinkarrow-up1611arrow-down136
arrow-up1575arrow-down1imageWe all have goals.lemmy.dbzer0.comBL4CKP1XX13 [they/it]@lemmy.dbzer0.com to linuxmemes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 days agomessage-square59linkfedilink
minus-squarestrawberry_enjoyer42@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 day agoI say “yes”, with one exception: if they remove the offending code, the project (as a whole) is no longer tAInted. And yeah; there are pure projects. NetBSD’s kernel is currently untAInted, but some things in the project (like GCC) are.
minus-squareHappyFrog@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·22 hours agoI find that to be a impossible standard to put on projects, and creates a community of distrust and accusations. I found the discussion of Bevy’s AI policy to be quite nuanced and fair. I hope you find projects that fit your requirements.
minus-squarestrawberry_enjoyer42@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·15 hours agoThe thing is, all of these old and respected projects existed before LLMs. It’s pretty easy to just… ban LLM usage on a project.
I say “yes”, with one exception: if they remove the offending code, the project (as a whole) is no longer tAInted.
And yeah; there are pure projects. NetBSD’s kernel is currently untAInted, but some things in the project (like GCC) are.
I find that to be a impossible standard to put on projects, and creates a community of distrust and accusations.
I found the discussion of Bevy’s AI policy to be quite nuanced and fair.
I hope you find projects that fit your requirements.
The thing is, all of these old and respected projects existed before LLMs. It’s pretty easy to just… ban LLM usage on a project.