“Human approval may not be enough to ensure manual control over AI-enabled decisions, witnesses told Congress Wednesday, as artificial intelligence takes on a greater role in military target identification and recommendations, and in turn, compresses time available to intervene.”

    • amemorablename@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 months ago

      I take it by this you mean they’re acting as if the AI has agency that it doesn’t and the humans can’t keep up with it, when the reality is that the humans have set the AI to act as it does and can change that?

  • Horse {they/them}@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 months ago

    how would you tell the difference between an AI fucking up and targeting a hospital by mistake and the current yankee military practice of bombing a hospital on purpose because they were bored?


  • crispbacon99@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 months ago

    Just another of the million glaring examples of AI just being a bad product. It’s nowhere near singularity levels as these tech bros would like you to believe.

    It does serve as a scapegoat for soulless idiots like hegseths “AI first military”. It’s no wonder they’re losing to Iran