• minorkeys@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    We haven’t seen anything yet. AI is yet to be granted execution powers to most of the digital world and soon that will one day change, and without proper safeguards.

  • XLE@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Articles are getting too redundant thanks to what I’d bet is AI. Not even sure if this one is reading past a couple sentences, which basically repeat what other people have said but slower.

    You’d be better off reading this tweet that the author referenced but failed to link.

    As Proton put it on [Twitter]:

    OpenAI says it runs locally and doesn’t build an index. Local execution isn’t the same as local processing. The moment ChatGPT summarises a thread or drafts a reply using a hosted model, that content leaves the machine.


    Here’s a glance at how poor the writing is. Compare this section

    “This is no different from email, SMS, Slack or Teams”

    It is.

    Think Signal, not SMS.

    SMS, ordinary email, Slack and Teams don’t provide the same promise of privacy as iMessage, Signal, or Proton, where the service is designed so the provider itself can’t read the end to end encrypted message content.

    To this section:

    Why iMessage is different

    Think Signal, not SMS.

    Some people think of Apple Messages as ordinary text messaging, but it’s one application supporting 3 different messaging services: regular SMS, end to end encrypted iMessage and, more recently, RCS.

    It’s the same thing, said slowly, and said twice. For no reason.

    • terabyterex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      23 hours ago

      the additional problem is that if someone you message with enables it, then your messages (to that person) are uploaded as well

      • Keilik@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        23 hours ago

        Somebody in a state that isn’t single-party consent sue over this, I’d be really interested in seeing how far that could go.

        • terabyterex@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          23 hours ago

          no, i dont think that applies…you have consented by sending the message. if person a sends a text message to person b saying bad things about person c. i am.pretty sure sibce you sent the message, person b can show person c. i think its because its written.

          then again, you can sue over anything. thats civil. (i just realized you said sue)

          • Keilik@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            22 hours ago

            In states without single party consent, both/all parties involved have to give consent to have their communications recorded. If one person consents for ChatGPT and the other doesn’t, then it would be a violation unless you specifically tell everyone that all messages going forward will be sent and read by ChatGPT.

            At least I’m relatively sure, but something about ChatGPT not being a sentient entity or something might invalidate it but it’s an interesting question.

            • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              22 hours ago

              That’s not true whatsoever. The act of sending a text message is already creating a record on the other device – that’s literally the entire point. You can’t sue somebody in a two-party consent state because they showed their friend Kevin all of the text messages you sent them, and the same applies to feeding it straight into ChatGPT.

              • Keilik@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                22 hours ago

                But it is because by sending messages back and forth shows consent between those parties. If Kevin sees text messages that he was not supposed to and then uses that information for harmful purposes he could be found liable, as clearly that was not the intent or Kevin would have been told himself either in a group message or individually.

                It’s not just how the information is gathered but how it is used, and in ChatGPT’s circumstances there’s no other logical use for those messages other than monetization.

                • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  22 hours ago

                  You’re making up ad hoc nonsense out of thin air. Literally nothing you’re saying is true, and you can’t will it into existence just because it’s what you want to be true or because it sounds plausible to you. You’ve cited absolutely nothing to substantiate your point, and the onus is on you because you’re the one saying it’s against the law.

                  Incidentally, you haven’t even mentioned a state; you’re just saying this is true in all two-party consent states, which is fucking wild and shows you have not the faintest idea what you’re talking about.

      • nobodysreadingthis@quokk.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Just cut the sloppers out of your life. They’re not people anymore. It’s like maga all over again, but not just men and olds.

        They won’t mind. They have their ai boyfriend to talk to.

  • 9tr6gyp3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Oh man, just wait until Apple rolls out their built-in co-Gemini app next month for their os27 releases. Im sure everything is going to stay super locked down and wont escape their Private Cloud Compute at all.