• Wxfisch@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 months ago

    This is infuriatingly stupid, the whole point of using things like “longer than 4 football fields” is that most people at least have a solid idea how big a football field is so have a frame of reference, but who the hell understands the weight of the Empire State Building?!? That is just such a useless frame of reference. Height sure, volume maybe, but weight or mass is just stupidly useless for something like a building.

    • A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      The problem with such big numbers is that it’s very hard to reference them usefully at all.

      I guess a percentage of all e-Waste would have been better, and that as a percentage of all waste. Also, in the USA or globally?

      But the whole thing seems a bit far-fetched to me: a) until 2030? b) how does AI produce e-waste?