In quantum materialism, you can’t know the value of a linen coat until you observe it, and once you do you don’t know where it was made

I’m going to give an honest answer to this, because it’s quite a serious question.
I actually don’t know what dialectical materialism is.

I am hoping it means this:

1. By process of elimination through contradiction, we can determine what the world is like.
2. The universe is material as opposed to the metaphysical.
3. Processes are material in motion.
4. Evolution exists due to the last mode of existence being one of internal contradictions… I think.
   So evolution is like retonavir-I capsules or capitalism or fuedalism.

Because I support this philosophy:

1. By process of elimination by fallacy, especially through rigorously restricting what words are allowed to be defined as,
   you can determine that there are three main categories of words, objects, concepts and names.
2. Objects are synonymous with shapes which are synonymous with material.
   Concepts are the metaphysical values dependent on objects
   and Names are key identifiers to set one object apart from another.
3. The universe is made out of shapes, in particular shapes with length, width and height, so 3D.
4. Processes are shapes in motion.
5. And oh yeah, the first thing you’ll realize through elimination by fallacy
   is that space and time are 0D and the universe is actually made out of a single shape, not multiple ones.
   So when I say the universe is made of shapes, I mean one shape and a lot of sub-shapes.
   A body is a shape, but so is an arm, a hand, a finger and a fingernail.
   The universe is a giant loom, with atoms being interconnected knots instead of lonely islands,
   everything is connected, but you don’t see those connections because those connections are what we use to see.

And Quantum physics does not fit into that.

Counterpoint: How will dialectical materialism be integrated into quantum physics