Against this backdrop, the NATO summit in Turkiye assumes a significance that extends well beyond a routine meeting. It is not merely a forum for discussing European security, but a platform for linking the Iranian dossier to the broader architecture of Western security. The US is seeking to elevate the Iranian issue beyond a bilateral dispute and transform it into a shared concern for the Western coalition. From this perspective, NATO is not just a military alliance, but a vehicle for the political, security and narrative alignment of Western allies against Iran.
…
However, this strategy is undoubtedly doomed to fail. Recent years have shown that many US and Zionist designs, despite their military superiority, political backing and complex security networks, have ended in attrition, disruption and failure when confronted with realities on the ground, the constraints imposed by local conditions and the deeply rooted resolve of resistance actors. Furthermore, the funeral processions attended by millions for the martyred commander in Iran and Iraq have once again shown that a genuine and sustainable order in West Asia is forged not through external American engineering, but around the social will of nations, the historical memory of resistance and deep bonds formed through opposition to domination.
Donald Trump is the modern day Lyndon B. Johnson.


