In a surprise victory for voting rights, the Supreme Court on Monday upheld a Mississippi law allowing mail-in ballots to be counted up to five days after Election Day, as long as they had been postmarked by the day of the election.
The 5-4 decision by Justice Amy Coney Barrett, which was joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and the court’s three liberal justices, averts a major election disaster that would have injected chaos into the midterms. Fourteen states have mail-in ballot grace periods on the books, and 30 states accept ballots from overseas and military voters sent before or on Election Day but only received after. The New York Times found that during the 2024 election “at least 725,000 ballots were postmarked by Election Day and arrived within the legally accepted post-election window.” Changing mail-in ballot deadlines months before the general election could have disenfranchised hundreds of thousands of voters who could have been unaware of the stricter rules, or have their ballots thrown out because of postal delays, or because they live in remote, rural locations in states like Alaska.
A major part of the news story is that 4 of 9 US Supreme Court justicies switch off their brain to support election conspiracies…
That’s a dangerous misunderstanding. They don’t switch their brains off, they know exactly what they are doing.
You’re absolutely right, it’s intentional: Those justices intentionally switch off the part of their brain that deciphers what words actually mean when they write dissents with this bs
The acceptance of these late-arriving ballots effectively postpones the date on which the electorate’s choice is made
The act of ballots getting to the counting office, is not when the electorate’s choice is made, by any stretch of the word, de facto or de jure. It is just about how long it takes ballots to get to the offices. In my eyes a similar argument under that twisted definition would be, if a precinct has not reported a result by 11:59PM election day for whatever reason, then that would also effectively postpone the date the choice is made. Should they just not count those votes?
yeah 5-4 decisions on things that should be 9-0.
This one is surprising since it doesn’t help the republican Scotus at all. I’m glad for the one dissent.
Roberts has been complaining that people have lost respect for the Court, so I expect this ie him trying to uphold it’s reputation. I also fully expect that, with so many of their decisions under Trump, that they will soon follow up with something more devastating to the liberals - and for them to also rule in favor of Trump’s election shenanigans closer to and after the election.
Yeah it’s not over yet…
I have my doubts that’s going to stop them from doing it anyway.




