On 3 June 2026, the European Commission adopted an ambitious set of measures to bolster the EU’s digital autonomy.
You must log in or register to comment.
The tricky part is that “reducing reliance on non-EU providers” is often not visible from the outside.
A tool may be headquartered in the EU but predominantly funded from the US, or hosted in the EU but owned by a US parent company. In such cases, it may still fall within the reach of the US CLOUD Act.
When I reviewed around 180 “European” SaaS alternatives, roughly one in six turned out to be EU-headquartered but mostly US-funded. That means sovereignty needs to be assessed at the ownership and sub-processor level, not only by looking at where the service is hosted.

