Not saying the woman didn’t die, but I’m finding it hard to believe that a healthy, conscious woman fell into knee-to-waist deep water, didn’t stand up to save herself, and drowned. There’s a photo in the link below which shows just how shallow British canals actually are. The water is knee-height, and two men are easily standing. In the middle of a canal, the water is waist-deep.
British canals also do not have currents and the water is still. I find it odd how they’re focusing on barriers (to stop people from falling into knee-to-waist deep water you can easily stand up in?) rather than the possibility of her being held down. The narrative just isn’t plausible at all. Any healthy, conscious adult, upon falling into waist-deep water at most, would simply stand up. If you ask me, something smells about this story (and all of the other "healthy, conscious adult fell into a shallow canal, didn’t stand up to save themselves with no explanation as to why not, and drowned" stories).
Them pointing out she couldn’t swim is a red herring. You don’t even need to swim in knee-to-waist depth water.
There’s no safety barriers because falling into a canal isn’t something that’s typically life-threatening to any healthy, conscious person. They don’t put safety barriers around paddling pools for the same reason.
How many accounts do you have?
You are really trying to push a narrative that you can’t drown in a canal.
Between alcohol, rocks and the height between the edge and bottom of a canal you absolutely can drown because you can’t move from an injury.
This has been explained to you and your sockpuppets several times.
deleted by creator
You seem to have mis-read. It says 7 feet wide. The canal is 4 feet deep.
4 feet deep, based on data from an AI summary on a Google search page.
Seems legit.
You are correct, I did misread it. They don’t seem to have bothered to record the depth of the canal (which as an American, I find bizarre). It does appear to be deep though, because they put out a warning saying that.
