Microsoft is running one of the largest corporate espionage operations in modern history.
Every time any of LinkedIn’s one billion users visits linkedin.com, hidden code searches their computer for installed software, collects the results, and transmits them to LinkedIn’s servers and to third-party companies including an American-Israeli cybersecurity firm.
The user is never asked. Never told. LinkedIn’s privacy policy does not mention it.
Because LinkedIn knows each user’s real name, employer, and job title, it is not searching anonymous visitors. It is searching identified people at identified companies. Millions of companies. Every day. All over the world.
You must log in or register to comment.
They cannot do that. They do scan the browser’s extensions, but the title is very misleading.
This is straight up misinformation. First off, it’s perfectly legal.
LinkedIn does browser fingerprinting. It’s the same thing Google and Meta do. It’s how Google Ads is shifting to a post-adblocker revenue stream.
Browser fingerprints show fonts used, audio codecs, WebGL render data, processor, operating system - enough that if you add up several factors together, it makes a statistically unique fingerprint. it does NOT scan applications on your computer. It can’t. It DOES scan which browser extensions you have running (if they affect page loading).
If you check your email and then close that and go to Google in an incognito window and search for porn - Google will fucking know what you’re looking at. Gmail and all Google apps all fingerprint, and then you’ll notice how Google ads trackers are on most sites online? Yep. That’s how they track you.
Use a VPN? Use an ad blocker? Great - Google doesn’t care. Google can track your fingerprint.
See your own fingerprint - check how it know it’s you visit after visit.
it does NOT scan applications on your computer
technically browser extensions are considered applications under EU’s GDPR
It DOES scan which browser extensions you have running (if they affect page loading).
as per their report:
Why two detection methods
Method Technique What it catches AED fetch() against known resource paths Extensions that are merely installed, even if they inject nothing into the current page Spectroscopy Full DOM tree walk Extensions that actively modify the page, even if they are not in LinkedIn’s hardcoded list it’s misleading to say its searching your computer tho…? this invokes the thought of LinkedIn getting to rifle through your files like it has access to ~/Documents/ or smth.
but yeah tracking you over the internet is similarly bad
I have NoScript for JS tracking, but what do you use for fingerprint randomisation?
I use CanvasBlocker.
I’m using canvas blocker and I’m still getting “Your browser has a unique fingerprint”
What am I missing?
I know that in Threadiverse 2 weeks is a very long time but I just checked out CanvasBlocker and for a moment I had a similar question
On the page of CanvasBlocker addon there is a link to https://browserleaks.com/canvas.
And once I installed the addon, the page started sayingUniqueness: 100% (The signature is unique to our database)which sounds bad. But if you refresh the page, you can see that the Signature changes everytime. And I think this is the core, everytime a page tries to fingerprint my canvas, it will get a different signature. Every time I open a page, from canvas vector, I will look like a different viewerRight, I see now. Thanks for the reply!
