• tootoughtoremember@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    He has managed to make himself a champion of young Canadians

    Only “young” Canadians care about affordable housing, affordable groceries, good-paying sustainable jobs, improved healthcare, and better electoral representation?

    Or are millenials in their 40s still “young” Canadians?

  • CircaV@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    9 hours ago

    His #1 issue is proportional representation. This is a game changer.

  • patatas@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Lol what an absolute hack job by Mulcair, clearly edited last-minute to tack on some shallow condolences to Avi for the loss of his father.

    Also, I wish Lewis wanted to nationalize stuff, but it’s not what his policies actually are. The CBC was also trying to frame his call for public options “nationalization”, so I guess even the public fuckin’ broadcaster is doing red scare stuff around policies not unlike the one that allows their own network to exist

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      11 hours ago

      I’m kind of hoping Lewis will start taking a more unapologetic position regarding nationalization. If they’re going to do the whole red scare thing anyways, why not just embrace it. I don’t think it even hits with young people the same way it does with boomers. People struggling under capitalism, who can barely make ends meet, and have to live with roommates because they can’t even afford a place of their own, aren’t so enamoured with the current system as not to seriously consider alternatives.

  • droopy4096@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Mulcair advises ring shallow as we saw NDP contract under him and not thrive at all. I’d love to hear Jack Layton on the subject but alas…

  • CanIFishHere@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Proposing a nationalized grocery store is not going to win votes. A lot of people understand how bad the government is at managing things. Far better would be to tax people less so they can afford necessities. It is insane when the government taxes us, and then we celebrate when they decide to give some money back (sounds like Trump, right?).

    • patatas@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 hour ago

      have you heard of SaskTel? It’s a public option for telecom/cell phones, and last I heard, Saskatchewan has by far the lowest prices on cell phone plans in the country, because the big telcos are forced to actually compete, instead of colluding with each other to rip us off.

    • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Public options are more efficient than private options see non-profits, healthcare, and education.

      When private they all cost more, non-profits you’ll see it in administrative fees.

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      If you’re so upset about taxes, just wait till you learn how wage labour works and the portion of the value you produce your boss appropriates while paying you a small portion of that as a wage.

    • Teppa@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      Just look at grocery stores, grocers are down to a 3-4% margins on food, and have some of the most efficient logistics networks in Canada.

      Contrast that to the governments involvement, they did the zoning laws for the land Loblaws sits, which they essentially turned companies like Loblaws into REIT which is how it derives most its net profit. Because it was more profitable for them to deal in land scarcity and appreciate from real estate speculation due to government caused shortages than it was to appreciate from selling products.