• Bronstein_Tardigrade@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    12 days ago

    I know, it’s to protect the children. Not sure why protecting children always requires everyone to lose their rights to privacy. At this rate, we’ll have to revert to encrypted walkie-talkies.

    • La Dame d'Azur@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      12 days ago

      What is a dissident if not a disobedient child? What is the state if not a firm but protective guardian?

      And as we all know children are most at risk from abuse by their own guardians…