- cross-posted to:
- technology@lemmy.world
- cross-posted to:
- technology@lemmy.world
cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/44218766
Retailer denies memory replacement due to 4x increase in DDR5 pricing, says price increase would equate to an ‘upgrade’ for the customer — Australian retailer refuses to replace faulty Corsair kit



If it’s classed as a “major” fault that essentially renders it unusable, the customer gets to choose the remedy, not the retailer.
This is usually so the customer can get their money back for a shit product, but there’s nothing stopping them from a replacement.
Umart’s claim that it’s “an upgrade” doesn’t hold much weight. If you buy X gigabytes of ram and it fails and you want a replacement with the same X gigabytes of ram, that’s not an upgrade. It’s restoring the status quo of the original purchase where they got a physical quantity of a product.