• Zedstrian@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Dedicating 5% of GDP to military spending is bullshit, but a degree of targeted spending is still needed to counteract aggression by countries like Russia that would otherwise invade countries like Ukraine with impunity.

    • aramis87@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      3.5% is supposed to be used on military weapons and gear, and a bunch of it could be dedicated to ensuring that current military stocks are maintained and usable; iirc, Germany discovered many of their stockpiled tanks hadn’t been properly maintained and therefore weren’t suitable to be sent to Ukraine, and other countries faced similar issues.

      The other 1.5% can be used on a wide range of “dual use” projects, including things like improving road and rail infrastructure and increasing civilian resilience.