The world is afraid to flex its muscle. An international canopy of objecters to the regime in control of Iran must unite and take definitive action. The final war must occur.
Likely war with Iran will draw in Russia. Iran will be supported by China, though they would not become boots-on-the-ground involved.
The war against Russia must occur. The leader known as Putin must be eliminated. He cannot afford to win a war on two fronts.
This will require added pressure in Ukraine. Then the clean sweep of Iran, which should not include civilian targets, should run its course.
There will be some kind of battle upon its horizons, the Russian border, which is friendly Turkenistan. Perhaps Azerbaijan. Which will be swift victories.
Then will come regime change in Iran. Out battle will commence. We must not allow the victor to be friendly to the caliphate. They must be crushed. A full Iranian revolution will then commence.
When the winner is decided, they must immediately be greeted by American representatives. They must be convenient and subservient to American needs. But not fully corrupted by our power.
The last stage will require economic infusement. The new ruling power will require our support, which we must provide. The Iranian people are a great people, and an ancient people, who deserve our guidance and remission—we must allow their own people to decide (provided they are progressive to an agreeable extent) the future of their own lands.
You must log in or register to comment.
Oh Myron, you’d be hilarious if your mental illness wasn’t so sad to watch unfold.
It would probably help your stance reach future readers if you elaborated what you disagree with and why.
I though you hated Trump but here you are supporting him bombing Iran knowing very well that it is not to help the Iranian people
I don’t support any actions outside the will of congress, the UN, and NATO.
Iran supplied the weapons used by Hamas to reignite the war in Gaza, Palestinian blood on their hands and not a drop of remorse.
If their despots can be wiped out then that will be just desserts.
1- The OP did not mention congress
2- Vietnam war was approved by the congress. Did You support that war of aggression where your terrorists killed over a millions Vietnamese?
3 - From an international perspective a revolt against a regime is internal affairs. Neither Nato and usa has the right to intervene
-
I mentioned Congress because the ability to go to war is an exclusive right of the US Congress.
-
The Vietnam War started as an admirable cause started by the French, to stop the dictatorship from taking power, but very early on it was clear that we lost and then idiots dragged the war on for a decade.
-
To prevent widespread death and suffering is cause to intervene, thats like the founding charter of the UN. Countries should have already intervened in Israel because they have ample justification, but apparently equal apathy.
Revolts are internal affairs the Principle of Non-Intervention is in the UN Charter (Article 2(7)).
The Vietnam war did not start with an admirable cause you are a fool for thinking that.
Israel is doing a genocide yet the USA is protecting Israelis over the Palestinians who are the occupied and victim of settler colonialism same with the other hypocritical western allies of the United Snaked
France’s objective was to re-establish the Indochina Union to exploit Vietnam’s rubber, tin, and rice resources. American motivation was to suppress an economical system that they disagree with.
You should be ashamed of justifying the Vietnam war in any shape and form
Oh you’re the snakes guy? what happened to your other account, lol?
-
Check his post history to understand my stance.
I can also check your post history, and you can check my post history. What I can’t check is the point that you haven’t made.
Fucking war mongers all up in here.
The will of the oppressed is often defeated by the will of the oppressor. It is such a beautiful inclination most people have that by doing nothing and continuing in our consumeristic tract, simply disagreeing, that human beings in distant cultures will just slowly align with ours.
The basic framework of human progress has been militant. It’s disgusting. However, doing nothing and expecting everything is nearly as disgusting as militarism.
Perhaps there is a world where people constantly exert their efforts non-violently to overcome a distant foe of unrighteousness. We just don’t live in that world…
As we have it, there are four main divisions in society, brahminical (priestly), kshatriya (warrior), vaishya (business and farming), and supra (helpers and delinquent [like oneself]).
I’m game, but I’d rather just provide the revolutionaries what they need, bomb Iranian Despots from the air or long range, and then fight Russia directly. I have no faith in Iranians to form a peaceful cooperative state, I’ve seen too much of what happened in Afghanistan and other places, but it can’t be worse than the current regime so I’d like US involvement to be kept at minimum while also supporting the will of the oppressed.
Sounds like something a Nazi would say.
Nazis absolutely were NOT all about helping revolutionaries overthrow regimes. Nazis allied with the USSR to split Europe in half, attacked other nations simultaneously with them, made friends with any despots they came across.
Oh Beloveds, One is a pacifist to the core. But one lives in an environment where most people are packing death colts. You have no idea. They have so many weapons that you could hardly understand. They have placed their faith in these firearms. They love them, believe in them as though God himself authorizes them.
They should be challenged. Live by the deadly weapon, die by one. It is the calculation of their own savior.
Thus it is no diminishment to require them to send their children into battle, since they have collectively chosen the sword.
And if we must do damage, let it be to the one nation which is so eternally corrupt and debased so as to deny a single argument I favor of them—none of you will regard these demoniacal individuals as worthy of running a country. Not one.
