Please skim the article and authors to get an idea of the message of this piece (and ideally also read it)

Authors:

  • Ekaterina Rhodes - Associate Professor, School of Public Administration, University of Victoria
  • Megan Egler - Postdoctoral Fellow, Public Administration, University of Victoria
  • Rowan Hargreaves - Research Associate, Public Administration, University of Victoria
  • Samuel Lloyd - PhD Candidate, Department of Psychology, University of Victoria

An excerpt of the intro:

Fossil fuel-dependent communities in Western Canada sit at the centre of Canada’s energy decisions. A just and inclusive clean energy transition will depend on how well governments listen to these communities and how fast they deal with the forces working to slow down energy decarbonization.

When it comes to the energy transition, public discussion tends to focus on emissions targets and policies to achieve them. These are important, but they’re just one aspect of the issue. In the oil- and gas-producing regions of Western Canada, conversations and concerns centre on livelihoods, identity and a nagging doubt: does anyone in power grasp rural realities?

Our ongoing research across the region — based on large citizen surveys, focus groups with municipal leaders and analysis of disinformation — highlights that emotions, narratives and perspectives of communities sit at the heart of Canada’s energy transition politics. As we mark the United Nation’s International Day of Clean Energy today, these voices demand attention before divides deepen further.

Focus groups with municipal staff from 10 oil- and gas-producing communities in British Columbia and Alberta revealed a delicate balancing act. They’re actively pursuing diversification — geothermal projects, hydrogen pilots, tourism expansion, data centres, manufacturing hubs, even rare-earth mineral processing — but most of these efforts build around, rather than beyond, oil and gas.

For many communities, the industry isn’t just jobs. It’s the economic engine funding hospitals, schools, arenas, roads and the very existence of their towns. Abstract talk of an energy transition can feel threatening when it overlooks this.

  • maplesaga@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    Demonstrate it first would be my suggestion. You don’t want to end up like Germany and deindustrialize.

    • StinkyFingerItchyBum@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      I think the concern here is that the oilsands use geography to lock in at least some of the wealth to locals. The refining is mostly done in the US, but the oilsands will effectively always be there providing high wages.

      Any clean energy transition efforts are considered more ephemeral for Albertans, because they have to be globally competitive. This means nascent development of solar manufacturing as an example, eventually gets offshored, or their wages get depressed like the offshore locations due to competitive pressures.