• 0ops@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    4 days ago

    In a statement to Reuters, a State Department spokesperson said the U.S. government does not have a censorship-circumvention program specific to Europe but added: “Digital freedom is a priority for the State Department, however, and that includes the proliferation of privacy and censorship-circumvention technologies like VPNs."

    So what’s the advantage of using this portal over one of the many reputable vpn providers that already exist?

    The big catch I see here is that the US is hardly an impartial player. Whatever form this “portal” takes will almost certainly bend toward the current administration’s world view. The bigger catch is going to be the inevitable data harvesting. I guaran-fucking-tee that there’ll be fuck-all in the way of privacy and security.

    • Encephalotrocity@feddit.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 days ago

      I guaran-fucking-tee that there’ll be fuck-all in the way of privacy and security.

      but but… they said “user activity on the site will not be tracked” 🙄

    • dude@lemmings.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      There aren’t “many reputable VPN providers” that are free. I guess that would be the main difference

  • RoidingOldMan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    What would stop this freedom.gov site from being blocked too?

    I can see how this would be a positive, especially in China. It’s being framed as an attack on the EU, but it seems like it would have bigger implications elsewhere.