The risks to U.S. forces would be far greater in an operation against Iran, which boasts a formidable arsenal of missiles. The US fully expects Iran to retaliate, leading to back-and-forth strikes.

☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmygrad.ml · 2 days ago

The risks to U.S. forces would be far greater in an operation against Iran, which boasts a formidable arsenal of missiles. The US fully expects Iran to retaliate, leading to back-and-forth strikes.

Maeve @lemmygrad.ml · 2 days ago

Would be a real shame if Washington devils were killed in targeted missile attacks like Iranian generals. Just saying.

Large Cane Toad@lemmygrad.ml · 2 days ago

Losing even just one carrier strike group to Iran would be catastrophic blow, because the US is maintaining a stretched global empire and Iran isn’t their main rival.

Assian_Candor [comrade/them]@hexbear.net · 2 days ago

I hate his “make a deal” bullshit

Like he’s buying a tacky casino

ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip · 1 day ago

Especially since we HAD a deal with Iran, that this dumbass tore up with no replacement planned in his first term.

The risks to U.S. forces would be far greater in an operation against Iran, which boasts a formidable arsenal of missiles. The US fully expects Iran to retaliate, leading to back-and-forth strikes.

The risks to U.S. forces would be far greater in an operation against Iran, which boasts a formidable arsenal of missiles. The US fully expects Iran to retaliate, leading to back-and-forth strikes.

reuters.com