• stoy@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      Because anti-woke pandering.


      That and also pandering to coal miners.


      Here is my suggestion instead.

      Stop using coal for pure power, it is way better used in heritage steam locomotives and steelmaking.

      • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        Stop using coal for pure power, it is way better used in heritage steam locomotives and steelmaking

        Fixed it for you. There’s no necessary use for burning coal that doesn’t have a better alternative.

        • stoy@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          Steam locomotives does not have a better alternative, it is part of the historical experience.

          There are also relatively few steam locomotives in use world wide, their impact is quite limited.

          Also to make carbon steel, you need to use coal.

          • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 months ago

            Steam locomotives does not have a better alternative, it is part of the historical experience.

            That’s just not true

            There are also relatively few steam locomotives in use world wide, their impact is quite limited.

            That also makes it easier to replace the fuel in all of them.

            Also to make carbon steel, you need to use coal.

            Sure, to make CARBON steel, you obviously need carbon. However, you do NOT need to make carbon steel since alternatives DO exist.

            TL; DR: Your “coal is necessary for anything” conclusion is decades behind modern technology.

            You should probably get with the times, lest you become a fossil yourself 😉

            • xade@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              Carbon steel is very much needed in a lot of places. It is harder than mild steel and is used in axles, gears, cutting tools etc.

              SSAB HYBRIT technology replaces the usage of coal/coke in the iron reduction stage with hydrogen which is nice since it only produces water and not CO2. But I can’t find any information regarding the carbon content of the resulting sponge iron. If the carbon content is too low you still need to add elemental carbon in some form.

              Edit: https://www.hybritdevelopment.se/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/hybrit-broschure-fossil-free-steel-production-ready-for-industrialisation.pdf

              Found all the answers I was looking for. :)

              The resulting sponge iron is 0% carbon meaning you need to add carbon in some form. The broschure mentions the use of either biocarbon or a small amount of natural gas. So no need for coal. Neat. :)