An Inside View of Why NYT’s Trans Coverage Has Been So Bad

fair.org

An Inside View of Why NYT’s Trans Coverage Has Been So Bad

fair.org

🦊 OneRedFox 🦊@beehaw.orgM to

Socialism@beehaw.orgEnglish · 27 days ago

A former New York Times editor affirms that the paper's fearmongering, pseudo-scientific, anti-trans coverage is a response to directives from the top.

You must log in or register to comment.

Chat

Socialism@beehaw.org

socialism@beehaw.org

Create a post

You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !socialism@beehaw.org

Beehaw’s community for socialists, communists, anarchists, and non-authoritarian leftists (this means anti-capitalists) of all stripes. A place for all leftist and labor news and discussion, as long as you’re nice about it.

Non-socialists are welcome to come to learn, though it’s hard to get to in-depth discussions if the community is constantly fighting over the basics. We ask that non-socialists please be respectful and try not to turn this into a “left vs right” debate forum by asking leading questions or by trying to draw others into a fight.

This community’s icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

Visibility: Public

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

1 user / day
41 users / week
100 users / month
469 users / 6 months
48 local subscribers
3.97K subscribers
2.64K Posts
3.12K Comments
Modlog