git [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net to Science@hexbear.netEnglish · 12 days agoThis paper in Management Science has been cited more than 6,000 times. It’s fatally flawed.statmodeling.stat.columbia.eduexternal-linkmessage-square1linkfedilinkarrow-up121arrow-down10cross-posted to: science@mander.xyzscience@lemmy.mlhackernews@lemmy.bestiver.se
arrow-up121arrow-down1external-linkThis paper in Management Science has been cited more than 6,000 times. It’s fatally flawed.statmodeling.stat.columbia.edugit [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net to Science@hexbear.netEnglish · 12 days agomessage-square1linkfedilinkcross-posted to: science@mander.xyzscience@lemmy.mlhackernews@lemmy.bestiver.se
minus-squarebuckykat [none/use name]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·12 days agoI know that the replication crisis happens across disciplines, and that social/“soft” sciences are no less valid and valuable than physical/“hard” sciences, but, Management science sounds even faker than (capitalist) economics
I know that the replication crisis happens across disciplines, and that social/“soft” sciences are no less valid and valuable than physical/“hard” sciences, but,
Management science sounds even faker than (capitalist) economics