You must log in or register to comment.
Now we’ll need to figure out why communist always side with brutal dictators and we will have the full picture.
there’s no need to “figure it out” since the state department is obliged to release their documentation 25 years after the fact via the freedom of information act.
tldr: they admit to shaping the narrative in the media to make people in the western world believe that they are dictators.
ml is leaking.
That is not true at all, fascism subordinates capital. It then robs owners of capital, and changes the oligarchs, often ruining if not killing or imprisoning them.
No the rich will be destroyed by fascism, by the monster they created. Then replaced with different rich.
Even before that, it will destroy the economy they rely on. That made them rich and protected them, that prevented parasitic business interests in league with government targeting productive companies.
No the rich are fucked, they just do not know it yet.
That’s not what happened in Europe. The opposite in fact. Many rich were completely fine during Hitler’s or Mussolini’s rule, profiting immensely from forced labor. They continue to be among the richest families in the world. Fascism is an unstable death cult, though. It always needs new victims and eventually destroys itself. So yes, long-term, you’re right.
That’s not completely true, though. Hitler was against “hoarding” capital and if you went against the party or were jewish, they annexed your capital (and most likely gave it to a loyal capitalist).
That’s not treating capitalism, as in the system.
Depends on the definition of capitalism. The Nazis wanted to manipulate the markets and change the legislative nature of property to benefit the nation.
But that might only have happened in theory. In practice they were really into capitalism.
They were simply lying in the beginning to device people.
