• MarxMadness [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    14 days ago

    I get it’s a meme and all, but no AES state has ever claimed they’re five years away from a stateless society. You’d be selling out your own people if you dismantled your state while the entire capitalist world wants to kill you.

      • EstraDoll [she/her, he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        30
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        14 days ago

        Fascists were running pogroms in the streets of Budapest, Kruschev was a revisionist bastard but the only mistake he made there was not sending more tanks

        But considering that you can call someone “tankie” with a straight face and act like it’s a serious point I take it you don’t have a fucking clue what I’m talking about because the last time you read a book was in high school

  • masquenox@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    14 days ago

    Remember… China has more than 300 billionaire parasites, meaning China harbours the second-largest billionaire parasite infestation on the planet after the US.

    Remember that next time your local tankies start blathering about (so-called) “AES” again.

    • whiskers165 [she/her, she/her]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      14 days ago

      “China Executes 14 Billionaires in 8 Years, Culture News Reports”

      https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2011-07-23/china-executes-14-billionaires-in-8-years-culture-news-reports

      https://archive.ph/SLDDg

      Sounds like they have their billionaire class under control. Over an 8 year period they executed something like nearly 5% but definitely more than 2.5% of the billionaire class for criminality.

      You project your understanding of the lawless billionaires of the West to China when their system simply does not work the same. Chinese billionaires face significant consequences for malfeasance and their class is closely controlled by the Party which they aren’t not even allowed to join. Their class is only allowed to join the non-voting advisory body called the Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference (CCPCC) where they can make legislative proposals for the CPC to review.

      So to review as a class their political influence is subordinated to the workers party and when they break the law they are held accountable, they are even executed for serious crimes.

      The billionaire class of China is incomparable to the lawless corrupt class of criminal billionaires that we have in the West

      • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        13 days ago

        “USA put the Enron guys in jail, it’s proof they have their billionaire class under control”

        • FunkyStuff [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          13 days ago

          Is there some substantial way in which billionaires in China have political power and conform a ruling class? Because I figure in the US billionaires are the ruling class, the president is one, yet in China billionaires are always scared that they are at the people’s mercy and can have it all taken away at any point.

          • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            13 days ago

            Billionaires in USA are the same way, or did you fail to notice the parade of billionaires prostrating themselves on Trump and kissing the ring? The mere existence of Billionaires is evidence of a failed system, and of definite non-existence of socialism.

            • FunkyStuff [he/him]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              13 days ago

              You think in the US the state controls the billionaires?

              Also I’m pretty sure Cuba is still socialist even though billionaires exist outside of Cuba. Hell, some of those billionaires might somehow own shares in enterprises that exist in Cuba, which would mean there’s workers in Cuba being exploited by capitalist billionaires. Does that make Cuba no longer socialist? Would it become not-socialist if the billionaires were Cuban instead (which would be preferable to being exploited by foreign imperialists, by the way)?

              • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                13 days ago

                You think in the US the state controls the billionaires?

                I think It’s a mutually beneficial relationship. The state can hurt the billionaires, and they can hurt the state. Both of these come at a cost to oneself, so they prefer cooperating for their class interest. Like Chinese billionaires do with their party partners. It’s only the ones who cause too much of a ruckus due to greed that get cut down. The others are coddled, like every other capitalist project.

                Also I’m pretty sure Cuba is still socialist even though billionaires exist outside of Cub[…]Does that make Cuba no longer socialist?

                Yes.

                • FunkyStuff [he/him]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  13 days ago

                  I think It’s a mutually beneficial relationship. The state can hurt the billionaires, and they can hurt the state. Both of these come at a cost to oneself, so they prefer cooperating for their class interest.

                  I guess I don’t think you are totally incorrect but this is a bad analysis regardless. You’re painting this as if it was a totally reciprocal and symmetric situation. The US state is totally subservient to the billionaire class: this is evident in its financial policy, foreign policy, down to the way elections are run. The actions you may point to as counterexamples are either capitalist infighting (e.g. the tech capitalists cannibalizing media, monopolization) or the state pushing one capitalist in line to protect the collective interests of all the others. In any long term frame, the US state does nothing but protect its capitalists. That’s what the state exists to do.

                  Like Chinese billionaires do with their party partners. It’s only the ones who cause too much of a ruckus due to greed that get cut down. The others are coddled, like every other capitalist project.

                  These 2 sentences are an error that can only be made by missing the forest for the trees as you did in the beginning of your reply. Do you really think the PRC operates with the same guiding principles and historical outlook as the imperialist US state? Looking at the news must be very confusing for you!

                  Also, you reject Cuban socialism? Do you think socialism is supposed to exist in the real world or is it just for intellectual masturbation?

      • masquenox@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        14 days ago

        Sounds like they have their billionaire class under control.

        Yeah… just like the old royals of Europe once thought they had the merchant classes under control, eh?

        Do tell tankie… how far is China in the “capitalism-to-socialism” pipeline by now?

        Somewhere in the middle, maybe?

        Why don’t you just admit that you don’t actually believe in concepts such as socialism and communism at all?

        • LeeeroooyJeeenkiiins [none/use name]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          14 days ago

          Yeah… just like the old royals of Europe once thought they had the merchant classes under control, eh?

          we can show you evidence that the capitalist class in China is clearly subordinated to communist party interests but you’ll just default to this non-thinking shit anyway so what’s the point

          western “anarchists” (whose posts histories are all NATO leftist shit, wahh wahhh the uighers etc) gonna keep malding, China’s responsible for literally all gains against poverty worldwide since the fucking 1980s, workers seeing 500% increases in average wages while standards of living are already higher than in the west (if you’re not too fucking ignorant to actually see what’s in front of your eyes)

          keep malding over THE TANKIES

        • Rom [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          14 days ago

          Why don’t you just admit that you don’t actually believe in concepts such as socialism and communism at all?

          Why don’t you admit this, dipshit?

          • masquenox@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            14 days ago

            Because you’re the tankie demonstrating your hypocrisy for all to see. Not me.

            So again… why don’t you just admit that you don’t actually believe in concepts such as socialism and communism at all?

              • masquenox@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                14 days ago

                Learn to read usernames, dumbass.

                I read yours. Twice. Are you as inane as your username suggests?

                a country that actually executes billionaires for misbehaving.

                Which billionaires are they executing, tankie?

                American ones? Japanese ones? German ones, perhaps?

                Mind clearing that up for me?

                • Rom [he/him]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  11
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  14 days ago

                  Which billionaires are they executing, tankie?

                  Are you so lazy that you can’t even read the article you were linked? Just read it, it’s not that long.

                  And what is your point here, anyway? Are you pro- or anti-billionaire? It’s really weird that you’re getting all upset about China executing billionaires, but here you are accusing everyone else of not being a real communist. Are billionaires a good thing or a bad thing? Pick a fucking lane already, lib.

        • whiskers165 [she/her, she/her]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          14 days ago

          I don’t believe in any political idealogies. I am a sceptic and committed to the advancement of humanity along whatever line brings the most good to the most people. China embodies this more than my home country or any of its allies. If your politcal dogma is more important to you than people I cant help you man. Unlike you I’m not married to any country or belief system.

          When liberals like you LARP as communists or anarchists or whatever your brains and critical thinking completely shut down when comparing the West and China. You become as dogmatic as fundamentalist Christians on this subject.

          Its like you know you are cucked by your ruling class and you are angry about the corruption and exploitation. Aware of. your own impotence you project your anger at other countries as a release valve.

          “Do tell libcuck: do you think calling people names is persuasive? Do you think simping for the American empire will bring about communism and socialism?” ^this is how you sound

          I bet if any other world government executed between 2.5% and 5% of a class in its country you would call it a genocide or crimes against humanity, but China executing criminal billionaires at that rate doesn’t even register to you as strict state control.

          I’m surprised a frothing at the mouth China hater like you wouldn’t even use this as an opportunity to criticize their overuse of the death penalty. Keep your eyes on the ball dude, you could have been hammering China for being authoritarian mass murderers but instead it’s, “nuh uh! Expecting nearly 1 out of 20 billionaires doesn’t constitute control!” Fucking clown

          • masquenox@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            13 days ago

            So do tell… when did the existence of a billionaire parasite class become an aspect of a socialist society?

            • MarxMadness [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              13 days ago

              When a socialist society needed to develop its economy enough to maintain internal support and survive against external aggression.

              China endured its Century of Humiliation and then a genocidal occupation during WWII. The communists then had to win their civil war, only to immediately face U.S. aggression on their doorstep in Korea, plus hostile U.S. bases all over Korea, Japan, and Taiwan. In 1950 it was a poor, largely pre-industrial country with urgent, existential problems. How quickly were they supposed to build utopia?

              • masquenox@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                13 days ago

                to develop its economy enough to maintain internal support

                It’s the second-largest economy on the planet, and is literally the largest state creditor.

                So at what point will the PRC be ready to actually do something that can be called socialism with a straight face?

                When their billionaires get tired of playing second-fiddle to a bunch of party bureaucrats, perhaps?

                How quickly were they supposed to build utopia?

                So… in your mind, concepts such as socialism and communism is “utopian…” not really realistic at all, correct?

                What is it that you really stand for, then?

    • Rom [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      14 days ago

      Seriously, it will never stop being funny to watch shitlibs who have never read a book in their lives call everyone to the left of them ‘tankie’ and ‘fascist’ then double down when leftists with an actual understanding of history try to educate them.

    • Deceptichum@quokk.auOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      14 days ago

      Emperors clothing.

      Crown is a 冕冠 (Mianguan), Robe is 衮龙袍 (Longpao).

      To be more accurate I should have gone with a 冕服 (Mianfu) to pair with the crown, or used a court hat instead of a crown with the robe.