• reactionality
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Oh, I didn’t follow your sarcastic “suggestion” to read up on tact as a lackluster veiled insult because you didn’t have the balls to write what was really on your mind? What a wonder.

    The fact that you admit you, yourself, failed to find anything intelligent there is proof of your lack of reading comprehension.

    Enjoy the self-imposed echo bubble of stupidity. Hope you don’t lose hearing from the echo, would be terrible for your audiobooks 🙄…

  • reactionality
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    If I’m telling a truth, emotions don’t come into play. If not, feel free to correct me (spoiler: you won’t because you can’t)

  • reactionality
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    And? I don’t have any obligation to follow your “rose glasses” narrative.

    If you want everything packaged softly for you then just don’t go on the internet 🙄.

    I’m not sorry I value truth over emotional pampering of strangers.

  • reactionality
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    11 months ago

    It’s a post about literal cognitive decline. Your red herring about audiobooks is misleading. I merely corrected your wrong and you’re sensitive about it.

  • reactionality
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    11 months ago

    If you’re misinterpreting my usage of “stimulation” as “enjoyment” or “engagement”, which you were, by the looks, then those are feelings.

    If you were interpreting me accurately, and yet still dispute the fact that reading is magnitudes more engaging cognitively, and that the original post was about cognitive decline, which cannot be fixed with a stopgap like audiobooks? Then you’re an idiot. Plain and simple.

  • reactionality
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    11 months ago

    Notice you’re distorting my words because you couldn’t argue against my real point? Or not, because your brain fried from not needing to use it through audiobooks 🙄…

    I said “stimulation”, as in, of the brain.

    Clearly you need a strawman to argue against that point.

    Oh and shut up about “feel[ings]” it’s literally proven that audiobooks activate the brain less than actual, physical reading. You know, with your fucking eyes.

    Clearly already tanked your reading comprehension, for one.