Source: https://www.cnn.com/2025/09/16/us/luigi-mangione-ny-court-hearing

Mangione’s defense had argued the terror-related charges should be tossed because crimes of terrorism as defined in New York state legislation refer to attacks on multiple civilians, not a shooting of a single individual.

“While the People place great emphasis on defendant’s ‘ideological’ motive, there is no indication in the statute that a murder committed for ideological reasons (in this case, the defendant’s apparent desire to draw attention to what he perceived as inequities or greed within the American health care system), fits within the definition of terrorism without establishing the necessary element of an in tent to intimidate or coerce,” Judge Gregory Carro wrote in his decision Tuesday.

  • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    6 months ago

    The Feds are really pooching this investigation. Either they sent in scrubs to run this case or he really is the wrong guy. Ffs, they claimed to have a manifesto from the shooter. “Terrorism” charges should be comically easy to stick.

    • slate@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      The jude said that a murder for ideological reasons does not, in itself, constitute terrorism. A manifesto is about ideology, so having one is not an automatic terrorism charge.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        murder for ideological reasons does not, in itself, constitute terrorism

        Murder to intimate or affect a change in behavior of a large group would be. But there should be evidence to this effect, which the police claimed they had.

        A manifesto is about ideology

        A manifesto is just a statement of intent. What it contains can vary substantially by author. But, critically, you need to prove the person committing the crime produced the document.

        I wonder if they failed to do this and got the document tossed. At that point, you’re coasting on the suspect’s social media history and hoping the judge gets Bad Vibes of casual comments.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        The judge is likely going to get dragged for not going along with the fiasco. You know its just a matter of time before Eric Adams or Andrew Cuomo or the Cheeto Himself weighs in on how unfair and far-left the SDNY has become.

  • caboose2006@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    6 months ago

    I know we joke about “I was white water rafting with Luigi on the snake river during the time of the murder” on here a lot. And it’s true. We were white water rafting.

  • peoplebeproblems@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    6 months ago

    Well duh, it’s because he didn’t shoot no one.

    And I keep telling you I saw that video, and ain’t no one shot that guy. And no one saw nothing cause there was nothing to see. He died of pre-existing conditions jeez.

  • shalafi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    6 months ago

    Prosecution tried to nail him with the terrorism charge because that’s about the only way to score a death penalty in New York state. Judge called bullshit. Nothing much more about it than to say thank god for some judicial sanity.