• HoopyFrood@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    So, like, who is it? Surely the Streisand affect couldn’t rear its ugly head for something like this

  • BalpeenHammer@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    As a reminder the public is not bound by any name suppression orders. If you know something, say something.

    • Dave@lemmy.nzM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Source?

      Name suppression in New Zealand is when someone’s name or identity is kept secret by the court. It’s usually done to protect the person’s privacy or to ensure a fair trial.

      This means the media and the public can’t publish or share that person’s name. That includes sharing a name in a private text message, oral communication, or on any online platform.

      https://www.1news.co.nz/2024/05/20/name-suppression-what-is-it-and-why-do-people-get-it/

        • Dave@lemmy.nzM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          The reason the court can make a judgement that gags people not involved is simply because that’s what the law says. The law says there is such a thing as name suppression where no one can tell others, and it gets invoked by a judge saying so. That’s all there is to it.

          The same way you have to pay taxes even though you were never involved in that decision.