Nina Turner: Dems need to fight more.

Dems Fight More

Nina Turner: How dare Dems fight more!

  • grte@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    6 months ago

    It’s entirely possible to take a principled stand which also happens to be foolish.

    • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 months ago

      I don’t think she’s foolish. I think she’s maintaining a bare minimum of ethical standards because she believes them to be universal truths instead of social compacts that should only bind your actions against others acting in turn.

      You might call that belief naive but I wouldn’t call actually standing by your principles foolish.

  • crusa187@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Nina’s right in principle, but probably wrong in strategy at this particular moment.

    She’s right because max-gerrymandering both sides is a surefire way to ensure max-disenfranchisement of voters. This is poison for “democracy,” if that’s something we still value in the US.

    She’s wrong at this very moment though, it sucks but if Repugs are doing this mid-cycle then democrats must respond in kind, and the correct action would be to use this to regain power and then actually pass laws to fix gerrymandering once back in power. I don’t believe Dems will do either, unfortunately.

  • Canaconda@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    No. She’s just wrong. Nothing crazy or interesting whatsoever.

    Americans turn over just enough DNC members every election to fool themselves into thinking a few good apples can un-spoil a bunch of rotten cores.

  • nek0d3r@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    Is it unethical? Yes. Will the other side play fair if we keep our ethics? Hell no. Playing nice in a corrupt system is fantasy and dems need to stop pretending like following the rules will win.

  • OccamsRazer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    Gerrymandering is always partisan, and “redistricting” is always gerrymandering. Always has been and always will be. The only alternative is a straight up popular vote, but that leads to the tyranny of the majority. So that leads us back to a perpetual argument about gerrymandering.

  • Archangel1313@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    She’s not wrong.

    A good analogy would be gun control. Obviously, the best strategy for eliminating gun violence, is to eliminate guns. No guns…no gun violence. That’s the point she’s making.

    This “solution” to the gerrymandering issue, is similar to saying, “if they have guns, we need guns too”. Also, not wrong…but also not a great “solution” to the problem.