• pc486@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 year ago

    Disappointing but not surprising. Most Democrats are not in favor of building housing. It’s too often politically suicidal at the local level to support development.

    • DrunkEngineer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Jurado’s web page states: “She focuses on expanding affordable housing, ending homelessness, supporting small businesses, tackling the climate crisis, and building a more just economy for all.”

  • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    The class war has a huge generational element.

    The boomer is the problem… Owners enable it to leech off working people in exchange for the political cover.

    Quality of life for people under 50 will continue to deteriorate until these parasites are dealt with at societal level

    Only other solution is to quit being poor

  • stinerman@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    A slim majority said Senate Bill 79 would take away the city’s control over housing growth.

    Yes, your decisions have been found to be lacking, so now you’re going to lose control over it.

  • Davriellelouna@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    One month ago, I actually wrote about this bill on the California instance.

    👇 👇 👇

    https://lemmy.world/post/33270682

    If you live in California, you should really be calling your state legislators.

    Remember that one idiot that gives a phone call has actually more political influence than 10 scientists that stay silent