I’ve been accessing my servers over Yggdrasil for the last few years and I never see it mentioned in self hosting communities, so here you go !

Yggdrasil works over IPv6 and brings encryption at the network interface level (similarly to a VPN). The cool thing is that your IP address is derived from your private key, so when you try to connect to a specific IP, your packets are encrypted so that ONLY the destination server can decrypt it (thus preventing MITM attacks). And as everything is encrypted at the NIC level, you can safely use plain text protocols ;)

How cool is that ?

  • @dirtyrig
    link
    English
    21 year ago

    Thanks for sharing. I recall hearing about this before. After reading this thread I’ve been trying to vend some of my selfhosted apps over yggdrasil. The documentation is difficult to find. A good tutorial would be really useful. Here are my two biggest stumbling blocks headaches:

    1. ipv6 headache: I had to update my server host binding from 0.0.0.0 to :: (from ipv4 to ipv6). Apparently ipv4 still works but now ipv6 also works. This was the biggest blocker for me gaining access to my apps over yggdrasil using ipv6.
    2. yggdrasil.conf headache: ipv6 syntax issues (apparently I need to learn me some ipv6 stuff) You need to put ipv6 ip addresses in brackets. This is an excerpt from my Listen attribute in my yggdrasil.conf file.
      # Listen addresses for incoming connections. You will need to add
      # listeners in order to accept incoming peerings from non-local nodes.
      # Multicast peer discovery will work regardless of any listeners set
      # here. Each listener should be specified in URI format as above, e.g.
      # tls://0.0.0.0:0 or tls://[::]:0 to listen on all interfaces.
    Listen: [
              tls://[::]:8000
              tls://[::]:8080
    ]
    

    I also downloaded an yggdrasil vpn app for Android and was able to access both apps with Android after adding a peer connection in the settings. Later, I added my Android public key to the AllowedPublicKeys to lock down my apps to be only accessible to my client.

    Thanks @wgs for the tip! 🏆

    • z3braOP
      link
      English
      11 year ago

      IPv6 is definitely another beast to learn, but Yggdrasil is totally worth it IMO. Plus that IPv6 knowledge you get will definitely be useful in the future ;)

  • @citytree@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    11 year ago

    Does this require a static IP address? Can it be easily used when all nodes are behind a NAT with dynamic IP addresses?

    • z3braOP
      link
      English
      11 year ago

      No static IP required ! I use it on my phone over LTE and it works great. Same goes for the NAT, I use it at work to where my laptop sits behind a NAT and I don’t have any issue.

  • epocsquadron
    link
    fedilink
    11 year ago

    🤯That is super cool! Is there a good comparison between this and WireGuard from a security perspective? I know Cloudflare is moving away from WireGuard and implementing MASQUE which uses HTTP/3+QUIC. Wonderful to see multiple attempts at this, interested to see what gets the adoption.

  • manitcor
    link
    fedilink
    English
    11 year ago

    this sounds a lot like part of how cloudflares tunnel works. me like!

    • z3braOP
      link
      English
      11 year ago

      I never used CF tunnels, but from the descriptions I read, it seem to serve a very different purpose. Yggdrasil will just connect your server to an overlay network that’s fully encrypted (but public). If you expose services over Yggdrasil, your server will be directly exposed on the network, you just get full encryption as a bonus. Cloudfare on the other hand will “shift” your server access to their own server, and redirect traffic internally to your server over a secure channel. This means that your server is not publicly accessible.

      • manitcor
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Not quite true, I use cloudflared daily, its simply a daemon that connects back to CF. The daemon is configured on the CF side to proxy various local network (class C) URIs. I usually toss the daemon in the private network with the containers. The machines themselves still work fine over normal internet, the daemon does not cut a system off it simply provides proxy forward services.

        This sounds very similar but without the configurability, just whatever I toss on the line I get. Which for the cases im thinking (replacing VPNs as suggested here) it will be great.

        • z3braOP
          link
          English
          11 year ago

          Ok thanks for the clarification (I’ve never used CF). Yggdrasil doesn’t act as a proxy at all though so it’s quite different. It simply creates a virtual interface on your host, and whatever comes in or get out of this interface is encrypted by default. Also, this interface can only access and be accessed over the Yggdrasil network.

          • manitcor
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 year ago

            its just attached at a different network layer. this would show up as an adapter on the machine i suspect.