• Kyrgizion@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 month ago

      If you mean in contemporary value, a denarius back then was a day’s pay for general labor.

      Today, denarii of caligula go for many thousands of €. This is a fourré, which is essentially a contemporary fake, and these are significantly less expensive, “only” hundreds instead of thousands.

  • Kyrgizion@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    “Ob Cives Servatos” - in service of the people

    “PP” Pater Patriae - father of the fatherland

  • khannie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    That’s a beauty. Congratulations.

    Just reading about fourré that you mention. Do you know it is one because of the oxidation at the bottom of the neck?

    • Kyrgizion@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yes, there’s a small hole at the bottom of the neck through which you can see corroded copper, and a larger hole in the portrait’s hair, showing the same. The weight is also lower than it should be because only the exterior is silver. The weight is the only way to identify them if they don’t have surface faults like this one does.

      • khannie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 month ago

        Super, thanks. Does that make it an actual forgery, or just one of the lower silver content ones that were doing the rounds back then because of debasement?

        Even still, it’s really beautiful so congrats again.

        • Kyrgizion@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          That’s the neat part; we don’t know. These fourrés were definitely struck with official coin dies. that means that either some of the mint workers had a lucrative side gig (very risky, counterfeiting was punishable by death), there were some very audacious thieves living in Rome at the time or, the most commonly accepted one; they were official coins temporarily debased for purposes of financing some whim of the emperor, most often a conquest but in Caligula’s case, excessive partying to the extent that his debauchery has become legendary.

          TLDR: probably not counterfeits, just the state fucking over the common man. Nothing new under the sun.

          • khannie@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 month ago

            That’s cool. Thanks! Mike Duncan goes into the various debasements a reasonable amount in his “History of Rome” podcast (cannot recommend this highly enough - I’ve listened to it twice through now) and I always assumed that it was in the form of just mixing in other metals before minting but that gives me a much clearer understanding.

            • Kyrgizion@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 month ago

              Oh that definitely also happened but it was a more gradual process spanning the course of several emperors’ reigns in mostly the second half of the second century and the third century CE. First century coins are renowned to be of high silver content, current example excluded.