It isn’t a “proprietary back end” it is what Stallman calls Service as a Software Substitute. (SaaSS) It wouldn’t matter if they claimed it was completely foss. You are still using a foreign service you don’t control.
With a package manager that is sort of unavoidable though. In the case of snaps you could always modify the source to have a different repo. The real reason not to use snaps is all the other issues.
Fair point.
Just to be clear: I am NOT a developer, so I may be very wrong on that take.
But from what I understand, the difference from what snaps does to what traditional packages does is that the Canonical repos are hard coded in it, thus making it harder to decentralise, and that’s not very in line with what many wish for a FOSS ecosystem.
I’m mentioning the “proprietary backend” drama around snaps. Not that I care too much, anyway. I use lots of proprietary software daily
It isn’t a “proprietary back end” it is what Stallman calls Service as a Software Substitute. (SaaSS) It wouldn’t matter if they claimed it was completely foss. You are still using a foreign service you don’t control.
With a package manager that is sort of unavoidable though. In the case of snaps you could always modify the source to have a different repo. The real reason not to use snaps is all the other issues.
Fair point. Just to be clear: I am NOT a developer, so I may be very wrong on that take.
But from what I understand, the difference from what snaps does to what traditional packages does is that the Canonical repos are hard coded in it, thus making it harder to decentralise, and that’s not very in line with what many wish for a FOSS ecosystem.