Skavau@lemm.eeM to Television@lemm.eeEnglish · 2 months agoWas a TV show you like ever ruined by the addition of a particular character to the point that you had to quit, or nearly quit?message-squaremessage-square66fedilinkarrow-up151arrow-down12
arrow-up149arrow-down1message-squareWas a TV show you like ever ruined by the addition of a particular character to the point that you had to quit, or nearly quit?Skavau@lemm.eeM to Television@lemm.eeEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square66fedilink
minus-squareWindex007@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·2 months agoAlso wasn’t he originally written as being independently wealthy? I think that aspect was also lost in the character transition.
minus-squaremutual_ayed@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·2 months agoYup, from rich ladies man to slob, and he didn’t even have the excuse of having kids! He had three money no kids!
minus-squarenaeap@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·2 months agoUpvoted for the much appreciated Simpsons reference
Also wasn’t he originally written as being independently wealthy? I think that aspect was also lost in the character transition.
Yup, from rich ladies man to slob, and he didn’t even have the excuse of having kids! He had three money no kids!
Upvoted for the much appreciated Simpsons reference