• Daedskin@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    8 hours ago

    As someone who’s worked on printer firmware before, it makes me really sad that a company can get away with making a consumer decide between getting access to any of the actually useful changes that engineers — who have no say over ink cartridge policy — put effort towards making the best product they could, or not having said ink cartridge policies forced on them.

  • pinheadednightmare@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Simple fix here, stop buying the companies that do this. I bought a brother printer and I won’t go back.

  • devilish666@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Sometimes I wonder why there’s no DIY Paper printer after seeing so…much shit in Printer Company ?
    We had advance DIY 3D Printer that can made various objects with various size and materials and yet there’s no DIY Paper printer until now

    • druidjaidan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      It’s not really surprising. The demand for printers has fallen off a cliff due to wide acceptance of digital alternatives. People barely need printers now and as such aren’t willing to pay much for them.

      This is further exacerbated by the reality that a printer is actually a fairly high precision device and expensive to manufacture.

      So you have an expensive to manufacture device that consumers aren’t willing to pay much for. So what happens? They adopt a consumable based business with the printers being locked down to force you to buy their overpriced, high margin consumables that have a low absolute price so consumers don’t think about it much.

      Let’s say that we regulate away this lock in. What will happen? Well the price of printers would have to climb to match their actual cost to manufacture. That price would likely turn off consumers from buying them at all. The end result would be the end of the printer business altogether. Maybe not a bad thing as not printing at all is likely a better ecological outcome.

      • devilish666@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Impressive…sadly it produce low quality print, but it’s good to see somebody actually made DIY Paper printer

  • JackFrostNCola@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 day ago

    Bullshittery aside, “HP Inc.” Instead of just “HP” Is on the nose and has to be deliberate on the journalists behalf

    • brandon@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      18 hours ago

      The actual reason is because in 2015 “Hewlett Packard” split into two companies, one called HP, Inc, and one called HP Enterprise. The print and consumer PC business went to HPI, while the server and network hardware went to HPE. So, writing just “HP” could be interpreted as ambiguous.

  • roofuskit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    75
    ·
    2 days ago

    Anytime a company reduces the functionality of a device through software or firmware they should have to offer to buy back the hardware. The depreciation rate should be set at time of purchase so you know how much you get if they neuter it a year from now.

    • notabot@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      2 days ago

      Why allow depreciation? You wouldn’t have bought it with the reduced functionality, and it’s going to cost you time and effort to remove it and replace it with something else. Inflation will reduce the value more than enough.

      • SplashJackson@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        Lawyers get paid either way, but that’s about the most that comes of it. Settling means no legal precedent has been set, so businesses can pull this bullshit again in the future

  • Einar@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    2 days ago

    I must buy a printer soon. Thank you for reminding me to avoid HP products.

      • Bluefruit@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 days ago

        This is the way. My brother printer is a hl2040, came out sometime in the early 2000s. It still prints. I’ve replaced the toner cartridge once since my Dad gave it to me back in 2016.

        The other day I needed to print something out and this was after I had reinstalled linux.

        Just fired right up, instantly recognized. Its one of the best pieces of hardware I own.

    • cm0002@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      Laser printer and probably brother, it’s worth the extra up front cost 10 fold

      For an old color Dell Laser printer I got from a thrift store years ago I can find 4 color sets of toner for it for $40-60

        • manualoverride@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 day ago

          Which printer and why? I just bought three L8690CDW Colour laser printers for me and my family after calling Brother who were happy to talk me thought my concerns, they informed me that this model does not have chipped cartridges so it’s ineligible for their cartridge subscription program and they also can’t tell if the cartridge is genuine or not. They don’t care if you use 3rd party toner.

          • Coreidan@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            No idea. Some model I bought off Amazon.

            The printer headers are constantly moving out of alignment. Every time I print I need to realign the headers.

            Probably has something to do with the printer starting up every few days and making a bunch of noise doing who knows what.

            I hate this fucking printer and will never buy brother again.

            Edit: according to my order history it’s the ink jet MFC-J4335DW.

            I realize that lasers are better from a printing consistency standpoint but the issue I have with it isn’t the ink. It’s everything else. Shitty design. It breaks down because it was poorly designed.

            If you want reliability brother ain’t it.

            • manualoverride@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              That noise is the heads being cleaned, which needs to happen on all inkjet printers. It may be that your one was simply broken. I bet if you call Brother and ask for some advice they will help you.

              • Coreidan@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                1 day ago

                I would. But a little research shows this is a very common problem with this model.

                Even if I get it replaced it will eventually happen again.

                Poor design.

                After all of these years these people still can’t get it right. Fool me once.

                Edit: it’s clear to me now that its “self cleaning” feature is responsible for why the heads get forced out of position. Wtf.

                • manualoverride@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  Still in warranty or less than 3 years old? I saw the Reddit post on this issue, might still be worth asking, they may have developed a hardware of software fix, and if not they may allow you to switch model.

  • yeehaw@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Oh BROTHER, not this again.

    On a more serious note, I’ve been all about brother printers for a few years now and couldn’t be happier.

  • m-p{3}@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Or they could like… just not be dicks and supply firmware updates without the lock-in, instead of having to trade off security to use your device however you want.

    • MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Well, here’s the story: The old HP MuFu finally caved in, so dad was going to the local multimedia retailer. I told him to get a Brother Ecotank, since i have to support it. But the store only had HP MuFu, so he got a HP MuFu that is even worse than the old one, despite being a laser printer instead of an inkjet. And the f*cking toner cost a whole 140€.

      • alphabethunter@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        From my experience, those last years. But they are indeed a bit expensive… I have had my eco tank for the last 5 years, only had to replace the b/w printer head after around 4 thousand prints, and I’m almost sure it was my own fault for using expired low-quality ink that I had bought in bulk for super cheap.