US President Donald Trump has signed an order to strip back the federally-funded news organisation Voice of America, accusing it of being “anti-Trump” and “radical”.

A White House statement said the order would “ensure taxpayers are no longer on the hook for radical propaganda”, and included quotes from politicians and right-wing media railing against the “leftist”, “partisan” VOA.

  • grue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    24 hours ago

    Everything Trump does – everything – suddenly makes sense when viewed through the lens of “how does Putin benefit?”

    • limonfiesta@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      23 hours ago

      That’s an incredibly myopic take that confuses correlation with causation.

      These moves may benefit Putin, but Russia isn’t the only county to benefit. Infact, Russia is in a historically weak position to fill gaps left by a receding American empire.

      I’d wager that China is likely to see much more geopolitical gains because they have the resources and capacity to take advantage of the situation.

      I’m not saying Putin won’t benefit, just pointing out how limiting it is to view Trump through a singular lens.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        18 hours ago

        Trump has had close business and personal ties with Russia since the 1980s. He very clearly admires dictators in general but Putin in particular, and has praised him on numerous occasions. In Trump’s infamous public call for election interference, it was “Russia, if you’re listening.” Not China, not some other country, Russia.

        If you can’t see the obvious signs of causation – not just correlation – you’re the one who needs some coke-bottle specs!

        I’m not saying Putin won’t benefit, just pointing out how limiting it is to view Trump through a singular lens.

        It’s the explanation – and the only one, to boot – that fits all the pieces. It may be a “singular lens,” bit it is singularly useful!