In Germany, we say “Hätte, hätte, Fahrradkette”… There is “criticizing a country” and there is “hate speech”. It’s not the same.
Ferner sollten Aussagen wie „From the River to the Sea“ unter Strafe gestellt werden
Finally something positive… That sentence is very dumb, because we all know that different people (especially Hamas) interpret is very differently. Don’t hide behind a sentence that openly invites everyone to misinterpret it!
My whole point is that criticism of Israel is equated to anisemitism. That’s the whole deal behind the ISRHA definition.
I do not agree with that. You saying it does not make it true.
In Germany, we say “Hätte, hätte, Fahrradkette”… There is “criticizing a country” and there is “hate speech”. It’s not the same.
I know the phrase and you’re using it wrong. Do you think that there weren’t examples of that stuff already happening?
Finally something positive… That sentence is very dumb, because we all know that different people (especially Hamas) interpret is very differently. Don’t hide behind a sentence that openly invites everyone to misinterpret it!
I don’t really get what you’re saying. Are you in favor of making the phrase illegal, or not?
I do not agree with that. You saying it does not make it true.
The mere existence of the term “israelbezogener Antisemitismus” proves me right. The IHRA definition is commonly known to equate the two, which is why the Jerusalem declaration exists.
Do you think that there weren’t examples of that stuff already happening?
There are examples of almost everything. There are even examples of humans pouring gas on humans and setting them on fire. That does not mean that it’s normal for our species or that there is a system behind it.
Are you in favor of making the phrase illegal
You got it. A little fine should do it…
israelbezogener Antisemitismus
I don’t even know what you are trying to say. Does it mean that one is against jews because of what happened in Gaza?
I’m sorry, but this conversation feels like a never-ending circle. I’m done with it.
There are examples of almost everything. There are even examples of humans pouring gas on humans and setting them on fire. That does not mean that it’s normal for our species or that there is a system behind it.
Your standards for a “Rechtsstaat” seem quite lacking, it seems.
You got it. A little fine should do it…
That still means it’s illegal, then.
I don’t even know what you are trying to say. Does it mean that one is against jews because of what happened in Gaza?
No. In Germany, you can be called antisemitic for criticizing Israel. They introduced a new category of “antisemitism” where you can be deemed antisemitic while actually not being racist against jews, but rather by questioning the zionist project.
In Germany, we say “Hätte, hätte, Fahrradkette”… There is “criticizing a country” and there is “hate speech”. It’s not the same.
Finally something positive… That sentence is very dumb, because we all know that different people (especially Hamas) interpret is very differently. Don’t hide behind a sentence that openly invites everyone to misinterpret it!
I do not agree with that. You saying it does not make it true.
I know the phrase and you’re using it wrong. Do you think that there weren’t examples of that stuff already happening?
I don’t really get what you’re saying. Are you in favor of making the phrase illegal, or not?
The mere existence of the term “israelbezogener Antisemitismus” proves me right. The IHRA definition is commonly known to equate the two, which is why the Jerusalem declaration exists.
There are examples of almost everything. There are even examples of humans pouring gas on humans and setting them on fire. That does not mean that it’s normal for our species or that there is a system behind it.
You got it. A little fine should do it…
I don’t even know what you are trying to say. Does it mean that one is against jews because of what happened in Gaza?
I’m sorry, but this conversation feels like a never-ending circle. I’m done with it.
Your standards for a “Rechtsstaat” seem quite lacking, it seems.
That still means it’s illegal, then.
No. In Germany, you can be called antisemitic for criticizing Israel. They introduced a new category of “antisemitism” where you can be deemed antisemitic while actually not being racist against jews, but rather by questioning the zionist project.
This video explains what I’m talking about