moe90@feddit.nl to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 5 days agoX expands lawsuit over advertiser ‘boycott’ to include Lego, Nestlé, Pinterest, and others | TechCrunchtechcrunch.comexternal-linkmessage-square174fedilinkarrow-up1744arrow-down122
arrow-up1722arrow-down1external-linkX expands lawsuit over advertiser ‘boycott’ to include Lego, Nestlé, Pinterest, and others | TechCrunchtechcrunch.commoe90@feddit.nl to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 5 days agomessage-square174fedilink
minus-squarestephen01king@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·5 days agoWhat about censoring " x ". That might help filter more posts.
minus-squarebillwashere@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·5 days agoYeah I had this thought as well. How I would love to be able to create filters based on RegExs. Something like: (?<!\w)X(?!\w) I think that might work.
minus-squarezergtoshi@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·5 days agoThis post would require "x " though.
minus-squareteft@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·5 days agoSounds like it’s time for people to learn regex.
minus-squaresugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·4 days agoYup: \<[xX]\> should do it, or whatever your regex engine’s word break character is (sometimes \b).
minus-squareValmond@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·5 days agoYeah like x = y, not generic at all 😅Also it won’t censor “bla bla x.”
What about censoring " x ". That might help filter more posts.
Yeah I had this thought as well. How I would love to be able to create filters based on RegExs.
Something like: (?<!\w)X(?!\w) I think that might work.
This post would require "x " though.
Sounds like it’s time for people to learn regex.
Yup:
\<[xX]\>should do it, or whatever your regex engine’s word break character is (sometimes\b).deleted by creator
Aye!
“^X .*$”
Yeah like x = y, not generic at all 😅Also it won’t censor “bla bla x.”