Fiat126@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 2 months agomy gleeby deeby asslemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square19fedilinkarrow-up1495arrow-down16
arrow-up1489arrow-down1imagemy gleeby deeby asslemmy.blahaj.zoneFiat126@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 2 months agomessage-square19fedilink
minus-squaresmitten@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·2 months agoI’m not actually, just that a binary integer that overflows at 60 couldn’t exist, hence the 5.907 whatever bit length
minus-squarejackeryjoo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·2 months agooh, that’s actually clever. And I’m saying that as a software engineer. I missed that possibility :)
minus-squaresmitten@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·2 months agoI should have phrased it differently, like “Ah yes, the well known 5.9068905956 bit integer.” But thanks
I’m not actually, just that a binary integer that overflows at 60 couldn’t exist, hence the 5.907 whatever bit length
oh, that’s actually clever. And I’m saying that as a software engineer. I missed that possibility :)
I should have phrased it differently, like “Ah yes, the well known 5.9068905956 bit integer.” But thanks